Skip to content
Hayden Eligon Ii
Hayden Eligon Ii

#8Hayden Eligon Ii

Hayden Eligon Ii is a Slot Specialist WR for Northwestern. Hayden's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 57 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hayden Eligon Ii's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
37 Receptions521 Rec yards3 Rec TD14.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume22
  • Explosiveness47
  • Consistency68
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.53 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.50 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Western Illinois.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5001.50Wk 2 vs Western Illinois: +1.50 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oregon: +0.01 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs UCLA: -0.94 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UL Monroe: +0.93 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Penn State: +0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Purdue: +0.40 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Nebraska: +1.42 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs USC: +0.96 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Michigan: +0.49 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Minnesota: +0.95 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Illinois: +0.70 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2vsWestern IllinoisW42-72178.51121.50
3vsOregonL14-3425.9177.0070.01
5vsUCLAW17-14-8.7144.004-0.94
6vsUL MonroeW42-7-21.638026.71370.93
7@Penn StateW22-2118.1273.5040.34
8vsPurdueW19-0-6.124321.50350.40
9@NebraskaL21-286.244812.00301.42
11@USCL17-3816.92189.00130.96
12vsMichiganL22-2412.422613.00220.49
13vsMinnesotaW38-351.5712718.10380.95
14@IllinoisL13-2012.989912.41200.70
20vsCentral MichiganW34-7-8.834515.0028

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.8%
Passing plays
17.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.0%
Passing downs
12.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.39
Passing downs
0.89
Pass / Rush EPA
0.63 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.