Skip to content
Harrison Wallace III
Harrison Wallace III

#2Harrison Wallace III

Harrison Wallace III is a Slot Specialist WR for Ole Miss. Harrison's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 89 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Harrison Wallace III's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
61 Receptions934 Rec yards4 Rec TD15.3 Yards/rec
Returns
14 Punt returns113 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume25
  • Explosiveness55
  • Consistency78
  • Pass-Down84
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.38 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.72 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Oklahoma (SP+ 18).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7201.72Wk 1 vs Georgia State: +1.23 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kentucky: +1.46 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arkansas: +0.77 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Tulane: -0.43 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs LSU: +1.27 EPA/play5Wk 8 vs Georgia: +0.49 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oklahoma: +1.72 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Carolina: +0.33 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs The Citadel: +0.93 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Florida: +0.46 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Mississippi State: +0.49 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsGeorgia StateW63-7-24.5513026.01471.23
2@KentuckyW30-231.8411729.30551.46
3vsArkansasW41-355.169215.31400.77
4vsTulaneW45-106.3144.004-0.43
5vsLSUW24-1910.311818.00181.27
8@GeorgiaL35-4324.14399.80120.49
9@OklahomaW34-2618.356412.80251.72
10vsSouth CarolinaW30-145.922814.00200.33
11vsThe CitadelW49-088710.90250.93
12vsFloridaW34-243.566811.30220.46
14@Mississippi StateW38-194.147218.01340.49
20vsGeorgiaW39-3424.1915617.3144
20vsMiamiL27-3120.744010.0020
20vsTulaneW41-106.32199.5016

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.6%
Passing plays
17.2%
Rushing plays
0.5%
Standard downs
6.9%
Passing downs
13.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.64
Passing downs
0.85
Pass / Rush EPA
0.78 / -0.77

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.