Skip to content
Gabriel Benyard
Gabriel Benyard

#1Gabriel Benyard

WR·Kennesaw State·2025

Gabriel Benyard is a Versatile WR for Kennesaw State. Gabriel's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 106 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Gabriel Benyard's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
117 Rush yards1 Rush TD17 Carries6.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
60 Receptions949 Rec yards9 Rec TD15.8 Yards/rec
Returns
25 Punt returns234 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume31
  • Explosiveness59
  • Consistency70
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.18 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • ▸Peak game: 1.77 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Indiana (SP+ 32).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.770−1.77Wk 1 vs Wake Forest: +0.71 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Indiana: +1.77 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Merrimack: +0.23 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas State: +0.77 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Middle Tennessee: -0.05 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.22 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Florida International: +1.75 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UTEP: -0.70 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs New Mexico State: +0.91 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Jacksonville State: +0.28 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Missouri State: +1.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Liberty: +1.50 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Jacksonville State: +0.49 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@Wake ForestL9-105.7510320.60470.71
2@IndianaL9-5632.425125.50321.77
3vsMerrimackW27-13—55410.81250.23
4vsArkansas StateW28-21-8.8611419.01540.77
5vsMiddle TennesseeW24-16-16.044110.3129-0.05
7vsLouisiana TechW35-7-1.37355.00170.22
9@Florida InternationalW45-26-10.559719.40521.75
10vsUTEPW33-20-17.51-1-1.000-0.70
11@New Mexico StateW24-21-15.537424.72340.91
12@Jacksonville StateL26-35-6.7510020.00270.28
13vsMissouri StateW41-34-10.7712718.12411.07
14@LibertyW48-42-9.048220.52301.50
15@Jacksonville StateW19-15-6.712121.00210.49
20vsWestern MichiganL6-41-1.455110.2016—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.0%
Passing plays
20.7%
Rushing plays
3.3%
Standard downs
10.5%
Passing downs
12.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.39
Passing downs
0.86
Pass / Rush EPA
0.62 / 0.28

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.