Skip to content
Forrest Brock

#11Forrest Brock

Forrest Brock is a Clutch Passer for Temple. Forrest's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 96 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Forrest Brock's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
60/103 Comp/Att541 Pass yards1 Pass TD5 INT58.3% Comp %
Rushing
28 Rush yards1 Rush TD28 Carries1.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency43
  • Clutch74
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency43th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.2700.27Wk 1 vs Oklahoma: -0.27 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Navy: +0.09 EPA/play2Wk 6 vs UConn: -0.06 EPA/play6
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@OklahomaL3-519.512/25128027.0-20-0.27
2@NavyL11-383.530/462771223.31600.09
6@UConnL20-291.518/321360116.8141-0.06

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
66.7%
Passing plays
100.0%
Rushing plays
24.7%
Standard downs
56.3%
Passing downs
82.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.15
Passing downs
0.03
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.03 / -0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.