Skip to content
Dylan Morris

#5Dylan Morris

Dylan Morris is a Volume Passer for Washington.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dylan Morris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
9/14 Comp/Att224 Pass yards1 Pass TD1 INT64.3% Comp %
Rushing
-5 Rush yards0 Rush TD1 Carries-5.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume16
  • Dual-Threat20
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch40
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 2.93 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Boise State (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.9302.93Wk 1 vs Boise State: +2.93 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tulsa: +1.20 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Michigan State: +1.33 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs California: +0.59 EPA/play4
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsBoise StateW56-195.91/13110100.02.93
2vsTulsaW43-10-13.72/2450099.91.20
3@Michigan StateW41-7-6.82/4630141.21.33
4vsCaliforniaW59-32-0.14/7850098.4-500.59

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.5%
Passing plays
8.7%
Rushing plays
1.0%
Standard downs
3.1%
Passing downs
12.5%

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.