Skip to content
Driphus Jackson

#6Driphus Jackson

QB·Rice·20148.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Driphus Jackson is a Clutch Passer for Rice. Driphus's 2014 season ranks in the 45th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 415 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Driphus Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
191/331 Comp/Att2842 Pass yards24 Pass TD8 INT57.7% Comp %
Rushing
401 Rush yards1 Rush TD121 Carries3.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency45
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat50
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch98
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)45th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.62 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Fresno State (SP+ -7).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6200.62Wk 1 vs Notre Dame: +0.36 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Texas A&M: +0.28 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Old Dominion: +0.31 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Southern Miss: +0.41 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Hawai'i: +0.05 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Army: +0.44 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs North Texas: +0.49 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Florida International: +0.44 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UTSA: +0.36 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Marshall: -0.28 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UTEP: +0.51 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.51 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Fresno State: +0.62 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Notre DameL17-4810.813/241631160.86100.36
3@Texas A&ML10-3820.221/322121079.68400.28
4vsOld DominionL42-45-12.715/221752084.71900.31
5@Southern MissW41-23-15.914/221782147.92300.41
6vsHawai'iW28-14-15.010/23248219.4-2600.05
7@ArmyW41-21-16.915/212093097.22900.44
9vsNorth TexasW41-21-9.413/262331053.82600.49
10@Florida InternationalW31-17-16.211/242302084.86600.44
11vsUTSAW17-7-3.418/282131167.84810.36
12@MarshallL14-4116.811/2399008.9-190-0.28
13vsUTEPW31-13-12.010/222272167.75300.51
14@Louisiana TechL31-76-1.725/403374371.6-400.51
1vsFresno StateW30-6-6.915/243183060.24100.62

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
48.0%
Passing plays
94.4%
Rushing plays
17.4%
Standard downs
36.3%
Passing downs
70.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.51
Pass / Rush EPA
0.42 / 0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.710−0.37
EPA per play · 2014 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.