Skip to content
Carter Bradley

#2Carter Bradley

QB·South Alabama·20227.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Carter Bradley is a Dual-Threat QB for South Alabama. Carter's 2022 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 477 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Carter Bradley's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
276/426 Comp/Att3352 Pass yards28 Pass TD12 INT64.8% Comp %
Rushing
50 Rush yards2 Rush TD68 Carries0.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency28
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat54
  • Consistency88
  • Clutch68
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.59 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Old Dominion (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5900.59Wk 1 vs Nicholls: +0.51 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Central Michigan: +0.43 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UCLA: +0.38 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.50 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Louisiana: +0.17 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs UL Monroe: +0.58 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Troy: +0.15 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Arkansas State: +0.27 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Georgia Southern: +0.23 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Texas State: +0.50 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Southern Miss: +0.46 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Old Dominion: +0.59 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Western Kentucky: +0.19 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNichollsW48-717/252603044.71010.51
2@Central MichiganW38-24-14.026/413543181.2800.43
3@UCLAL31-3215.026/362371181.3800.38
4vsLouisiana TechW38-14-17.814/211783164.3500.50
5@LouisianaW20-172.018/412450133.6610.17
7vsUL MonroeW41-34-15.725/334203076.2900.58
8vsTroyL6-108.129/402240143.1-400.15
9@Arkansas StateW31-3-13.017/241791045.91700.27
10@Georgia SouthernW38-31-6.416/271931224.2-1500.23
11vsTexas StateW38-21-11.520/342744078.1-600.50
12@Southern MissW27-20-3.515/222383270.6-500.46
13vsOld DominionW27-20-13.017/291903176.02200.59
1vsWestern KentuckyL23-441.736/5336032-500.19

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
51.3%
Passing plays
94.8%
Rushing plays
10.4%
Standard downs
44.8%
Passing downs
65.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.64+0.10
EPA per play · 2022 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.