Skip to content
Cameran Brown

#8Cameran Brown

Cameran Brown is a Dual-Threat QB for Texas Tech.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cameran Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
4/9 Comp/Att11 Pass yards0 Pass TD1 INT44.4% Comp %
Rushing
83 Rush yards0 Rush TD8 Carries10.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency83
  • Volume20
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch40
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)83th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (83th percentile).
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 0.72 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Washington State (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7200.72Wk 1 vs Abilene Christian: -0.64 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Washington State: +0.72 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs North Texas: -0.28 EPA/play3
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsAbilene ChristianW52-5120-0.64
2@Washington StateL16-371.30/100095.57000.72
3vsNorth TexasW66-21-4.54/811011.0110-0.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.0%
Passing plays
6.0%
Rushing plays
8.5%
Standard downs
8.3%
Passing downs
4.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.53
Passing downs
Pass / Rush EPA
-1.22 / 0.82

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Cameran Brown Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Texas Tech · Gridpex