Skip to content
Byron Marshall

#9Byron Marshall

WR·Oregon·20130.2 pts line value1st Round

Byron Marshall is a Versatile WR for Oregon. Byron's 2013 season ranks in the 57th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 143 plays — a average rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Byron Marshall's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2013 Production

Rushing
1038 Rush yards14 Rush TD168 Carries6.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
13 Receptions155 Rec yards0 Rec TD11.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2013 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency57
  • Volume59
  • Explosiveness33
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down54
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)57th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.62 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Nicholls.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
De'Michael HarrisSouthern Miss0.1300.715.2
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.1500.024.2
Hyleck FosterMarshall0.1800.518.2
D.J. FosterArizona State0.2001.034.8
Davis BrysonKennesaw State0.2000.019.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6200.62Wk 1 vs Nicholls: +0.62 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Virginia: -0.52 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tennessee: +0.60 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs California: +0.08 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Colorado: +0.10 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Washington: +0.20 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Washington State: +0.61 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs UCLA: +0.00 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Stanford: -0.04 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Utah: -0.26 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona: -0.25 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Texas: -0.17 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsNichollsW66-3188.0080.62
2@VirginiaW59-10-5.2100.000-0.52
3vsTennesseeW59-145.113636.00360.60
5vsCaliforniaW55-16-8.73124.0060.08
6@ColoradoW57-16-0.72178.50120.10
7@WashingtonW45-2420.50.20
8vsWashington StateW62-388.225427.00350.61
9vsUCLAW42-1420.012323.00230.00
11@StanfordL20-2621.7-0.04
12vsUtahW44-2111.8-0.26
13@ArizonaL16-4214.6-0.25
1vsTexasW30-710.5252.503-0.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.6%
Passing plays
3.8%
Rushing plays
33.3%
Standard downs
21.5%
Passing downs
18.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.02
Passing downs
0.05
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / -0.00

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.730−0.63
EPA per play · 2013 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.