Skip to content
Ben Wooldridge

#10Ben Wooldridge

Ben Wooldridge is a Dual-Threat QB for Louisiana. Ben's 2024 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 322 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ben Wooldridge's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
192/291 Comp/Att2453 Pass yards17 Pass TD6 INT66.0% Comp %
Rushing
174 Rush yards5 Rush TD65 Carries2.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency86
  • Clutch53
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency86th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.72 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Coastal Carolina (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7200.72Wk 1 vs Grambling: +0.37 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kennesaw State: +0.53 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Tulane: +0.13 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Wake Forest: +0.71 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Southern Miss: +0.35 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs App State: +0.50 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.72 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Texas State: +0.56 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arkansas State: +0.45 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs South Alabama: +0.10 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsGramblingW40-1025/333083183.4600.37
2@Kennesaw StateW34-10-25.115/191891077.13100.53
4vsTulaneL33-415.719/342382265.12920.13
5@Wake ForestW41-38-5.720/292573087.53410.71
6@Southern MissW23-13-25.622/302221066.2-300.35
7vsApp StateW34-24-8.114/231982166.52510.50
8@Coastal CarolinaW34-24-6.927/363733085.7210.72
10@Texas StateW23-175.418/282521079.03900.56
11vsArkansas StateW55-19-9.917/262641042.61900.45
12vsSouth AlabamaL22-242.88/13910144.61000.10
20vsTCUL3-3410.87/2061015.4-180

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.1%
Passing plays
89.0%
Rushing plays
13.9%
Standard downs
46.1%
Passing downs
61.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.42
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.74

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.