Skip to content
Amad Anderson Jr.
Amad Anderson Jr.

#15Amad Anderson Jr.

Amad Anderson Jr. is a Versatile WR for Temple. Amad's 2023 season produced 41.8 total EPA across 40 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Amad Anderson Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
37 Receptions647 Rec yards3 Rec TD17.5 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Punt returns18 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume22
  • Explosiveness70
  • Consistency75
  • Pass-Down83
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.24 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.40 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Memphis (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.4002.40Wk 1 vs Akron: +1.50 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Rutgers: +0.70 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Norfolk State: +1.13 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Miami: +0.51 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tulsa: +0.36 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs North Texas: +0.52 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs SMU: -0.32 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Navy: +1.71 EPA/play10Wk 13 vs Memphis: +2.40 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsAkronW24-21-21.646516.30281.50
2@RutgersL7-363.523618.00280.70
3vsNorfolk StateW41-957915.80391.13
4vsMiamiL7-419.61011711.70460.51
5@TulsaL26-48-13.747518.81390.36
7@North TexasL14-45-6.722211.00110.52
8vsSMUL0-5510.1133.003-0.32
10vsNavyW32-18-13.728140.50741.71
11@South FloridaL23-27-6.6
13vsMemphisL21-453.5716924.12752.40

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.7%
Passing plays
12.6%
Rushing plays
0.8%
Standard downs
8.4%
Passing downs
6.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.99
Passing downs
1.18
Pass / Rush EPA
1.10 / 0.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.