Skip to content
Aidan Robbins

#3Aidan Robbins

RB·BYU·2023

Aidan Robbins is a Committee Back for BYU. Aidan's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 83 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Aidan Robbins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
485 Rush yards1 Rush TD101 Carries4.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
7 Receptions33 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume59
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving28
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.36 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.41 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Oklahoma (SP+ 15).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4400.44Wk 1 vs Sam Houston: -0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Southern Utah: -0.44 EPA/play2Wk 8 vs Texas Tech: +0.08 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs West Virginia: +0.20 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Iowa State: -0.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Oklahoma: +0.41 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oklahoma State: +0.04 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsSam HoustonW14-0-13.87233.30110-0.29
2vsSouthern UtahW41-16362.00-0.44
8vsTexas TechW27-146.116493.100.08
9@TexasL6-3523.217563.30240
10@West VirginiaL7-377.510373.7133100.20
11vsIowa StateL13-457.510585.80-0.07
12vsOklahomaL24-3115.0221828.300.41
13@Oklahoma StateL34-406.716744.601-300.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
20.5%
Passing plays
3.2%
Rushing plays
39.1%
Standard downs
21.7%
Passing downs
18.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.02
Passing downs
0.12
Pass / Rush EPA
0.00 / 0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.