Skip to content

Which is the best college football conference in 2016?

Analysis

Every FBS team is a dot. Conference averages are not shown, and that is the point: the SEC’s mean is dragged up by four teams, the Big Ten’s spread is twice the Sun Belt’s, and a bar chart of means says none of it. What “compare the conferences” actually asks is how much of one league sits inside the other.

CORE defense · 2016

FBS medianACCBig TenSECPac-12Big 12American Athlet…FBS IndependentsSun BeltMid-AmericanMountain WestConference USA

One dot per team, one tick per conference median. Leagues are ordered by median, and the mean is deliberately not shown — four teams drag it and it hides how far the two distributions overlap.

ConferenceTeamsMedianSpreadBest
ACC14-6.412.4Clemson -18.7
Big Ten14-5.311.2Ohio State -22.0
SEC14-3.110.2Alabama -31.7
Pac-1212-2.113.6Washington -17.4
Big 1210-1.67.3TCU -7.2
American Athletic120.18011.1UCF -11.9
FBS Independents41.413.6BYU -5.7
Sun Belt114.016.9App State -9.0
Mid-American124.46.6Ohio -5.4
Mountain West125.79.3San Diego State -12.8
Conference USA138.012.4Western Kentucky -5.9

Two numbers, not one

Median answers “how good is this league”. Spread — the interquartile range — answers “how evenly good”, and it is usually the more interesting of the two. A league with a high median and a huge spread is four contenders and eight teams padding their records, which is exactly the shape that produces a conference champion who keeps losing in January.

Note which metric you are looking at. CORE is opponent-adjusted, so it can be compared across leagues honestly. The raw metrics cannot: a conference that plays itself twelve times has its schedule strength baked into every raw number, which is the single most common way conference comparisons go wrong.