Skip to content

Florida State Seminoles

ACC·1-1·
Elo
1557#51
SP+
6.9#44
FPI
7.3
AP
NR
Next@ Alabama · Wk 3Win prob 28%Model +9.0
Talent #21 (800.2)Recruiting class #1640% production returning

Roster · 109 players

FR 51SO 18JR 18SR 22
#PlayerPosClHtWt
1Malachi MarshallQBJR6'2"168
4Dean DeNobileQBSR6'2"203
9Kevin SperryQBFR6'1"210
12Michael GrantQBJR6'3"216
14Ashton DanielsQBSR6'2"225
16Jaden O'NealQBFR6'3"231
3Samuel Singleton Jr.RBJR5'11"205
5Quintrevion WisnerRBSR6'0"203
21Zay ParksRBSO5'11"204
22Gemari SandsRBJR5'11"208
24Amari ThomasRBFR5'11"210
32Ousmane KromahRBSO6'1"216
0Duce RobinsonWRSR6'6"230
7Jasen LopezWRFR6'0"182
8Micahi DanzyWRSO6'1"194
10EJ WhiteWRFR6'2"171
11Devin CarterWRFR6'1"176
13Tae'Shaun GelseyWRFR6'4"227
15Jayvan BoggsWRSO6'1"209
19Darryon WilliamsWRFR6'0"183
81Jonah WinstonWRFR5'9"171
82Teriq MalloryWRFR6'5"215
84Brandon BennettWRFR6'0"180
86Tony BlandWRFR6'0"193
88Keenen JeuneWRFR6'0"195
6Desirrio RilesTESR6'3"235
18Landen ThomasTEJR6'4"234
23Chase LoftinTEFR6'6"235
44Gavin MarkeyTEFR6'1"234
80Corbyn FordhamTEFR6'4"235
83Xavier TillerTEFR6'5"239
85Drew HardwickTEFR6'5"224
89Greyson LabiadTESR6'3"249
51Paul BowlingOLSO6'3"305
52Chavez ThompsonOLFR6'1"318
54Chastan BrownOLFR6'8"300
55Bradyn Welch-JoinerOLJR6'2"327
56Steven PickardOLFR6'5"335
58Luke Francis Jr.OLFR6'5"349
59Steven MooreOLJR6'5"327
63Jakobe GreenOLFR6'3"315
65André OttoOLJR6'5"318
69Mike IonataOLFR6'6"308
71Nate PabstOLSR6'7"315
72Donald AkhibiOLFR6'7"260
73Nikau HepiOLFR6'7"379
74Jonathan DanielsOLSO6'4"321
75Sean PoretOLFR6'5"296
77Xavier ChaplinOLSR6'8"346
78Jayden ToddOLSO6'6"303
79Chimdia NwaiwuOLJR6'5"307
1Darryll DesirDLSO6'5"259
3Mandrell DesirDLSO6'4"270
5Daniel LyonsDLSR6'4"292
8Deante McCrayDLSR6'4"291
13Deamontae DiggsDLSR6'5"272
15Rylan KennedyDLSR6'3"251
32Jalen AndersonDLJR6'2"242
54Earnest RankinsDLFR6'4"274
55Kevin WynnDLFR6'2"317
88Jordan SandersDLSR6'4"310
90Jaemin PinckneyDLFR6'5"222
91Cam BrooksDLFR6'4"243
92Judah DanielsDLFR6'3"272
94Franklin WhitleyDLFR6'6"282
95Christian Collins-MurrayDLFR6'3"224
96Tylon LeeDLFR6'4"271
98Wihtlley CadeauDLFR6'5"284
9Omar Graham Jr.LBSR6'1"234
10Chris JonesLBJR6'1"231
20Blake NichelsonLBSR6'3"222
28Mikai GbayorLBSR6'2"222
29Caleb LaValleeLBJR6'1"225
30Izayia WilliamsLBFR6'2"226
31Karon MaycockLBFR6'1"220
35Ethan PritchardLBFR6'2"224
38Daylen GreenLBFR6'1"213
41AJ CottrillLBSR6'0"229
42Chris ThomasLBJR6'2"230
43Trent RogersLBFR6'3"216
45Noah LaValleeLBFR6'2"227
53Brandon TorresLBJR6'1"232
0Quindarrius JonesDBSR6'2"187
4Charles Lester IIIDBSO6'1"195
6Ja'Bril RawlsDBJR6'1"178
7Ashlynd BarkerDBSR6'3"217
11CJ Richard Jr.DBSO6'1"200
12Nehemiah ChandlerDBSO6'1"183
14Ma'Khi JonesDBSO5'11"195
16Karson HobbsDBJR6'1"189
18Jamari HowardDBSO6'2"190
19Jarvis Boatwright Jr.DBSO6'1"197
21Max RedmonDBFR6'1"196
22Zae ThomasDBFR6'3"207
23Chuck KennonDBFR6'2"186
24K.J. KirklandDBJR6'1"209
26Ricky Knight IIIDBSO6'0"184
27Jordan CrutchfieldDBFR6'3"218
33Antonio Cromartie Jr.DBFR6'0"190
37Tre Bell IIIDBFR5'11"199
40Darin TownsendDBFR6'0"155
47Donny HiebertDBSR6'2"201
39Gabe PanikowskiPKSR5'9"206
93Conor McAneneyPKSO6'3"213
36Daniel HughesPJR6'5"219
85Ethan PostPFR6'3"230
87Carter JulaPSO6'1"205
48Caleb BowersLSSR6'1"237
53Alex NoccoLSFR6'2"210

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
29.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
22.0
scoring defense
Differential
+7.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
371.5#92
Yards / play
5.5#91
Passing yards / game
163.5#114
Rushing yards / game
208.0#43
First downs / game
18.0#102
3rd down %
34.5%#104
4th down %
60.0%#59
Time of possession
31:54#51
Defense
Yards allowed / game
452.0#123
Yards / play allowed
6.8#123
Pass yards allowed / game
351.0#134
Rush yards allowed / game
101.0#58
3rd down % allowed
58.1%#135
Sacks
3#58
Tackles for loss
8#67
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+3#14
Takeaways
5#6
Giveaways
2#68
Penalties / game
5.0#38
Penalty yards / game
46.0#56

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

Florida State is in year 7 under Mike Norvell, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are offensive, led by 5th in the push up front.

On fourth down he goes for it more often than his peers do from the same spots (+3.8%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −19.9% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Florida State has played 2 games against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Offensethe push the line gets
    #5
    projected
  • Offenserunning it
    #13
    projected
  • Offensesurviving second and twelve
    #16
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 9 to play
4.56.5
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
3.5
of 9 games
Bowl odds
24%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
71%
vs Boston College
Toughest
12%
vs Miami

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 9 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

12345678910
final winstallest bar = 27% chance
Likeliest finish 4-7 (27%)Bowl eligible 24% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBAshton Daniels
+22.1 EPA
RBSamuel Singleton, Tre Wisner +1
+15.3 EPA
WRDuce Robinson, Micahi Danzy +1
+4.2 EPA
TELanden Thomas, Desirrio Riles
-0.5 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +22.10.307/play72 snaps
EPA +10.00.434/play23 snaps
EPA +3.40.095/play36 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.2450th#69
Def0.2714th#119
Explosiveness
Off1.3774th#37
Def1.4220th#111
Field position
Off70.558th#58
Def74.831st#95
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off5.2783rd#24
Def3.0061st#55
Turnovers
Won 5Lost 2
Margin +3

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.3147th#74
Off · rush
0.2466th#47

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.2464th#50
Def0.0543rd#79
Passing
Off0.3146th#75
Def0.4913th#120

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.31#47
2nd-level / open-field
1.09 / 1.58
Power / stuff (off)
50.0% / 13.9%
Havoc — total (def)
15.7%#70
Havoc — front 7 / DB
7.5% / 8.2%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.14
Def0.10
Pass downs
Off0.47
Def0.55

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.05#770.15#800.49#83
Defense0.15#114-0.40#91.45#137

Elo Trajectory

New Mexico StateFinal
Elo rating 15371557+20 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.2452nd
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.2722nd
  • Offense success rate41%35th
  • Defense success rate allowed45%25th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs45%36th
  • Offense success — passing downs33%48th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs46%39th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs40%16th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.477th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.518th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.160th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.377th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.362nd
  • Defense line yards allowed3.126th
  • Offense highlight yards1.671st
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.5357th
  • Offense power success0.6738th
  • Defense power success allowed0.8334th
  • Offense stuff rate0.1461st
  • Defense stuff rate0.1112th

Third down

  • Third down conversion36%28th
  • Third down distance faced6.464th
  • Third down conversion allowed58%5th
  • Third down distance forced8.066th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.0444th
  • Net success rate — second half-0.1514th

Drives

  • Points per drive2.970th
  • Points per drive allowed2.340th
  • Average starting field position2852nd
  • Opponent starting field position2666th
  • Available yards gained55%66th
  • Available yards allowed61%24th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive95%80th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed89%34th
  • Points per scoring opportunity3.164th
  • Points allowed per opportunity2.655th
  • Three-and-out rate15%76th
  • Three-and-outs forced16%24th

Roster

  • Returning usage31%38th
  • Returning EPA16365th
  • Team talent composite80085th
  • Recruiting class rank16.089th
  • Recruiting class points25289th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.242#69 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.313#75
Rush EPA/play
+0.241#50
Explosiveness
1.374#37
Pts/opportunity
5.27#24
Success rate
41.0%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.072 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disruptive defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.268#119 · bottom 20%
Havoc rate (total)
15.7%#70
Front-7 havoc
7.5%
DB havoc
8.2%
Big play rate allowed
1.421#111
Success rate allowed
44.8%

Disruption comes primarily from the secondary.

📊

Season Signature

Points per game
29.0
Points allowed/game
22.0
Scoring margin/game
+7.0
Turnover margin
+3won 5 · lost 2
Production returning
40%
Talent rank (247)
#21

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE50thEXPLOSIVENESS74thFINISHING83thFIELD POS58thDEFENSE14thHAVOC50th50th100th
Offense
50th
Explosiveness
74th
Finishing
83th
Field Pos
58th
Defense
14th
Havoc
50th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+3.6
#58
Offense
+5.1
#35
Defense
+1.4
#84
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 20 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive2.902.32
Starting field positionown 28.3own 25.6
Available yards55.3%61.4%
Scoring opportunities95.0%89.5%
Points per opportunity3.052.59
Three-and-out rate15.0%15.8%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
39.8%
Expected, given the spots
47.6%
Over expected
-7.8
Fourth down vs peers
+10
Fourth down vs the model
+0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Florida State is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Florida State in 2026

by EPA/play distance
StanfordSP+ -4.7
Off EPA/play +0.278Def EPA/play +0.244Elo 1354
Match
98%
AkronSP+ -21.4
Off EPA/play +0.190Def EPA/play +0.228Elo 929
Match
97%
East CarolinaSP+ -8.1
Off EPA/play +0.174Def EPA/play +0.257Elo 1477
Match
97%
IllinoisSP+ +7.5
Off EPA/play +0.310Def EPA/play +0.245Elo 1595
Match
97%
Oregon StateSP+ -6.8
Off EPA/play +0.183Def EPA/play +0.312Elo 1260
Match
96%
Texas StateSP+ -7.8
Off EPA/play +0.185Def EPA/play +0.326Elo 1441
Match
96%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +20.3, #9 of 1282016: +26.1, #8 of 1282017: +10.9, #30 of 1302018: +3.1, #51 of 1302019: -0.1, #63 of 1302020: -8.6, #92 of 1242021: +9.7, #41 of 1302022: +22.3, #7 of 1312023: +16.3, #20 of 1332024: -13.2, #111 of 1342025: +14.3, #29 of 1362026: +3.6, #58 of 138
20152026
Now +3.6 · #58 of 138Best +26.1 in 2016Worst -13.2 in 2024

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-10-1
50%
1.1-0.1
20255-72-6
42%
6.5-1.5
20242-101-7
17%
1.8+0.2
202313-19-0
93%
10.5+2.5
202210-35-3
77%
9.5+0.5
20215-74-5
42%
6.0-1.0
20203-62-6
33%
3.2-0.2
20196-74-4
46%
7.0-1.0
20185-73-5
42%
4.0+1.0
20177-63-5
54%
6.7+0.3

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

1.0%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-1 so far, projected to finish 5.5-6.5.

If they finish with…

77%
2 losses
7.2%
3 losses
0.2%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 2.

down 7.2 points since preseasonwon 34-17 over New Mexico State against an expected margin of +30, so 15.4 against the number.

  • At 2 losses they are 77% where the average ACC team is 44%.
  • The ACC takes 1.54 bids in an average season, and four or more in 0.7%.

Florida State’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk7at Miami5.9
  • wk3at Alabama4.4
  • wk13vs Florida3.0
  • wk11at Pittsburgh2.8
  • wk6at Louisville2.5
  • wk5vs Virginia2.2

Who to root for

Games Florida State is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk12Texas over Arkansas0.5
  • wk12Kentucky over Missouri0.4
  • wk9North Carolina over Miami0.4
  • wk2Utah State over Washington0.4
  • wk11Duke over Miami0.4
  • wk4App State over NC State0.4
The full playoff picture →

ACC

0-1 in league play, projected 3.1-4.915 of 17 by title odds
0.3%
Wins the ACC
0.7%
Reaches the title game

The ACC sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 37% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk7Florida State at Miami2.0

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole ACC race →

If not the playoff, then

49%
Bowl eligible
49%
Placed in a bowl
1.0%
In the playoff
50%
Season over in November

Florida State is 1-1 and needs 5 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 0.9% they go with five wins, as a 5-7 fill-in — which in reality is decided by academic progress rate, not by anything modelled here.

  • Military Bowl7.3%
  • Pinstripe Bowl6.9%
  • Pop-Tarts Bowl6.0%
  • Fenway Bowl5.3%
  • Sun Bowl4.9%
  • First Responder Bowl3.9%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 16 have sent Florida State a player since 2010 — 55 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Florida State's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
IMG AcademyFL112
Miami CentralFL92
St. Thomas AquinasFL74
American HeritageFL41
ColumbiaFL41
Glades CentralFL31
Miami Carol CityFL31
Booker T. WashingtonFL30
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.