Skip to content

South Alabama Jaguars

Sun Belt·1-1·
Elo
1390#92
SP+
-11.4#106
FPI
-9.6
AP
NR
Nextvs Ohio · Wk 3Win prob 38%Model +4.6
Talent #107 (573.4)Recruiting class #7779% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on South Alabama

All news

South Alabama's coverage is the worst draw Tulane could have

Matchup · 5d ago

South Alabama routs SE Louisiana, 39-14

Matchup · 6d ago

Roster · 116 players

FR 32SO 17JR 22SR 45
#PlayerPosClHtWt
4Bishop DavenportQBSR6'2"210
7Jared HollinsQBJR6'4"210
15Taylor Jacobs Jr.QBFR5'11"195
16Aaden ShamburgerQBFR6'2"180
18Jerry HorneQBSO6'0"200
0PJ MartinRBSR5'10"205
3Keenan PhillipsRBJR5'10"185
17Anthony JefferyRBSO5'8"190
20Lavonte ColeRBFR5'11"195
21Trae'von DunbarRBJR5'10"205
22Caleb WynnRBFR5'9"205
24Julyon JordanRBSO5'9"180
26Donovan CrowRBFR5'11"215
1Anthony EagerWRSR6'1"185
2Jeremiah Jones-ThomasWRSO5'11"180
6Micah WoodsWRSR6'0"190
8Noah TosterWRSR6'4"200
10Khatori MarionWRFR5'11"180
11Trae StevensonWRSO5'11"190
12Brendan JenkinsWRSR6'0"195
13Jarvis Washington Jr.WRFR6'4"190
19Jerrian GrahamWRJR6'1"200
23Dominic WhiteWRFR6'1"190
27Tylen CampbellWRSR5'10"185
81Miguel CamboiaWRSR5'9"175
85Brian BarnesWRJR6'1"215
89Brandon NolanWRFR5'10"170
9Rod GibbsTESR6'4"250
14Maddox LynchTESO6'5"240
34Cam McFarlinTEJR6'4"240
82Julius MathisTEFR6'4"230
83Everett HunterTESR6'4"250
84Nate ForystekTESR6'5"260
87Jordan MorrisTESR6'4"230
88Owen CarlsonTESO6'2"230
51Diego CamboiaOLSR6'5"265
52Andre WoodsOLJR6'3"330
56Naol AndargeOLJR6'5"300
57Shalik HubbardOLSR6'4"330
58Cam'Ron ThompsonOLFR6'3"330
60Devon WallerOLSR6'3"290
61Julius KiddOLSR6'2"260
62Kyle GreakOLFR6'2"293
64Jamal SilerOLJR6'4"310
66Devin WhiteOLSO6'2"280
67Artem Korchagin Jr.OLFR6'4"300
68Reese Osei-WusuOLSR6'4"310
69Kenton JeridoOLSR6'3"340
70Elliott ChaneyOLFR6'5"290
71Jaylen BookerOLJR6'5"305
72Ethan HubbardOLSR6'6"295
73Jamal ScottOLFR5'11"230
74Aydan NewellOLFR6'3"315
77Kearius BivensOLSO6'5"295
79Eric MahanOLFR6'3"402
9Emmanuel WallerDLSR6'3"275
18Mase LewisDLSR6'3"275
39Rodney HunterDLJR6'2"305
41Tyler CarterDLJR6'4"290
49Tre BrownDLSR6'3"295
56Stephen JohnsonDLSR6'3"310
75Tyler WileyDLFR6'3"275
80Brayden HurstDLFR6'3"310
85Andrew WashburnDLSR6'2"270
90E'Mauri SmileyDLSO6'1"265
93Jeremiah WaldrondDLSR6'2"275
94Andrew HinesDLSO6'3"285
0Parker ShattuckLBJR6'1"220
6Kaydon DegraffenreidLBSR6'0"225
10William Felton IVLBJR6'1"225
16Seidrion LangstonLBSR6'1"220
17Christian RossLBSR6'2"235
20Tirrell JohnsonLBSR6'2"230
22Caleb DozierLBJR6'2"220
25Tre'Mon HenryLBSR6'1"235
26Xavious Anderson Jr.LBFR6'0"225
27Zechariah HallLBFR6'1"230
30Perry HandLBFR5'11"200
33Tyray DarensburgLBFR5'11"225
42Dylan ChiedoLBSR6'0"230
43Jacob PorcoLBJR6'1"210
44Donnie ArnoldLBSO5'11"235
45Demetress MosleyLBFR6'2"195
46Terry Kirksey Jr.LBSR6'2"245
48Jordan WilliamsLBSR6'2"230
53Latrelle LettLBSO5'8"235
3Tre Webb IIICBSR6'0"190
7Deuce VanceCBSO6'0"180
12Jaylen MosonCBSR5'11"175
15Colby WilliamsCBSR6'0"185
19TJ CollierCBFR6'0"180
23Cube GurleyCBJR6'1"195
24Damyrion DarbyCBJR5'11"180
34Bradley ThomasCBSR5'11"175
37Evan JonesCBFR6'0"175
1D.J. MooreSSR6'0"200
2Jayvon HendersonSSR5'10"190
4Kohl BradleySSO6'0"190
8Dallas YoungSSR6'0"205
13Kam RobinsonSSR5'11"185
14Cole BlaylockSSR6'0"190
21Deon CallinsSFR5'10"190
28Tomareo Johnson Jr.SFR6'2"200
29Kaleb JacksonSSR5'8"180
31Dashaun CaffeeSJR5'7"165
32Camen UpshawSFR6'0"200
35Matthew LaseterSSO6'0"180
36Teryn GreenSFR6'0"215
38Braiden CheshireSFR5'10"175
35Davis LittlePKJR6'0"175
37Dylan FreeburyPKSO5'10"180
38Peyton ArgentPKJR6'0"195
98Christopher AikmanPKFR5'11"150
40Aleksi PulkkinenPSR6'4"215
44Baxter TurnerLSSR5'11"200
47Grant RountreeLSJR6'1"215

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
31.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
21.0
scoring defense
Differential
+10.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
395.0#74
Yards / play
4.6#119
Passing yards / game
154.0#119
Rushing yards / game
241.0#29
First downs / game
27.0#23
3rd down %
41.2%#79
4th down %
50.0%#67
Time of possession
40:09#3
Defense
Yards allowed / game
231.0#37
Yards / play allowed
6.2#110
Pass yards allowed / game
186.0#65
Rush yards allowed / game
45.0#10
3rd down % allowed
0.0%#1
Sacks
1#104
Tackles for loss
4#114
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+2#22
Takeaways
2#53
Giveaways
0#1
Penalties / game
5.0#38
Penalty yards / game
47.0#57

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

South Alabama is in year 3 under Major Applewhite, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are offensive, led by 32nd at staying out of the backfield. The way in is 112th at holding the line of scrimmage, and they are 107th at shutting down the ground game.

On fourth down he goes for it more often than his peers do from the same spots (+3.4%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −17.4% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

South Alabama has not played an FBS opponent yet, so this is the projection: last season regressed toward the mean, plus returning production, recruiting, talent and whether the staff is the same one.

Projected strengths

  • Offensegetting stopped at the line
    #32
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensethe push the line gets
    #112
    projected
  • Defensemoving the ball on the ground
    #107
    projected
  • Defenseturning trips inside the 40 into points
    #107
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
5.26.8
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
4.2
of 10 games
Bowl odds
40%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
74%
vs UL Monroe
Toughest
16%
vs Marshall

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 27% chance
Likeliest finish 5-7 (27%)Bowl eligible 40% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBBishop Davenport
+10.8 EPA
WRMicah Woods, Brendan Jenkins +2
+8.6 EPA
RBTrae'von Dunbar, PJ Martin +1
+1.9 EPA
TERod Gibbs
+1.0 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +10.80.300/play36 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.1431st#96
Def0.1828th#99
Explosiveness
Off1.1529th#98
Def1.3824th#105
Field position
Off65.117th#115
Def70.571st#41
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.6366th#48
Def2.4074th#37
Turnovers
Won 2Lost 0
Margin +2

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.2029th#98
Off · rush
0.1654th#64

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.1652nd#67
Def-0.3493rd#10
Passing
Off0.2028th#100
Def0.5110th#124

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.05#68
2nd-level / open-field
0.90 / 0.25
Power / stuff (off)
77.8% / 14.6%
Havoc — total (def)
29.7%#4
Havoc — front 7 / DB
16.2% / 13.5%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.02
Def-0.04
Pass downs
Off0.44
Def0.66

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.19#1230.18#760.83#34
Defense0.25#1280.43#117-0.26#9

Elo Trajectory

SE LouisianaFinal
Elo rating 13901391+1 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 31 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.1739th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.1731st
  • Offense success rate42%39th
  • Defense success rate allowed41%39th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs45%34th
  • Offense success — passing downs35%55th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs44%43rd
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs30%43rd

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.130th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.333rd
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.9436th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.730th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.364th
  • Defense line yards allowed1.591st
  • Offense highlight yards0.4026th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.9438th
  • Offense power success0.8063rd
  • Defense power success allowed0.2586th
  • Offense stuff rate0.1460th
  • Defense stuff rate0.3185th

Third down

  • Third down conversion50%66th
  • Third down distance faced6.943rd
  • Third down conversion allowed0%99th
  • Third down distance forced8.882nd

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.0645th
  • Net success rate — second half-0.216th

Roster

  • Returning usage76%90th
  • Returning EPA18170th
  • Team talent composite57323rd
  • Recruiting class rank77.045th
  • Recruiting class points18745th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Balanced offense — below average EPA/play nationally
EPA/play
+0.140#96 · below avg
Pass EPA/play
+0.196#100
Rush EPA/play
+0.163#67
Explosiveness
1.146#98
Pts/opportunity
4.63#48
Success rate
39.2%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.033 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

High-pressure defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.176#99 · below avg
Havoc rate (total)
29.7%#4
Front-7 havoc
16.2%
DB havoc
13.5%
Big play rate allowed
1.383#105
Success rate allowed
37.5%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

31.5 PPG offense, 21.0 allowed — +10.5 margin/game
Points per game
31.5
Points allowed/game
21.0
Scoring margin/game
+10.5
Turnover margin
+2won 2 · lost 0
Production returning
79%
Talent rank (247)
#107

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE31thEXPLOSIVENESS29thFINISHING66thFIELD POS17thDEFENSE28thHAVOC98th50th100th
Offense
31th
Explosiveness
29th
Finishing
66th
Field Pos
17th
Defense
28th
Havoc
98th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-4.8
#84
Offense
-0.2
#60
Defense
+4.6
#110
Full CORE ratings →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. South Alabama is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to South Alabama in 2026

by EPA/play distance
San José StateSP+ -12.8
Off EPA/play +0.126Def EPA/play +0.175Elo 1413
Match
99%
KentuckySP+ +8.5
Off EPA/play +0.155Def EPA/play +0.178Elo 1476
Match
99%
Michigan StateSP+ +1.0
Off EPA/play +0.141Def EPA/play +0.192Elo 1468
Match
99%
MinnesotaSP+ +9.6
Off EPA/play +0.130Def EPA/play +0.191Elo 1510
Match
99%
South FloridaSP+ -3.1
Off EPA/play +0.141Def EPA/play +0.146Elo 1679
Match
98%
Sam HoustonSP+ -21.5
Off EPA/play +0.168Def EPA/play +0.157Elo 1164
Match
98%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -18.2, #110 of 1282016: -15.6, #109 of 1282017: -20.7, #120 of 1302018: -18.8, #116 of 1302019: -17.2, #115 of 1302020: -11.1, #97 of 1242021: -10.4, #98 of 1302022: +0.8, #64 of 1312023: +11.0, #30 of 1332024: +5.8, #46 of 1342025: -14.2, #104 of 1362026: -4.8, #84 of 138
20152026
Now -4.8 · #84 of 138Best +11.0 in 2023Worst -20.7 in 2017

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.0+0.0
20254-83-5
33%
5.0-1.0
20247-65-3
54%
7.9-0.9
20237-64-4
54%
7.8-0.8
202210-37-1
77%
10.3-0.3
20215-72-6
42%
6.7-1.7
20204-73-5
36%
3.9+0.1
20192-101-7
17%
2.9-0.9
20183-92-6
25%
2.9+0.1
20174-83-5
33%
3.6+0.4

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.3%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-0 so far, projected to finish 5.9-6.2. Wins the Sun Belt in 4.1%.

If they finish with…

17%
1 loss
0.2%
2 losses
0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

up 0.1 points since preseason.

  • At 1 loss they are 17% where the average Sun Belt team is 20%.
  • The Sun Belt takes 0.14 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.3% of seasons, having won their league in 90% of those.

South Alabama’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk4at Kentucky1.8
  • wk2at Tulane0.9
  • wk10at Louisiana0.7
  • wk8at Marshall0.7
  • wk6at Arkansas State0.6
  • wk9vs Louisiana Tech0.6

Who to root for

Games South Alabama is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk12UTEP over Air Force0.2
  • wk6Kent State over Western Michigan0.2
  • wk9Purdue over Penn State0.2
  • wk12UL Monroe over App State0.2
  • wk3TCU over Arkansas State0.2
  • wk4Lindenwood over Eastern Michigan0.2
The full playoff picture →

Sun Belt

West division · 0-0 in league play, projected 4.0-4.010 of 14 by title odds
4.1%
Wins the Sun Belt
12%
Reaches the title game

The Sun Belt keeps divisions (East and West) and sends the winner of each — so South Alabama can finish with the league’s second-best record and still stay home. The last berth is level on percentage in 47% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk10South Alabama at Louisiana8.7
  • wk6South Alabama at Arkansas State8.1
  • wk9Louisiana Tech at South Alabama7.8
  • wk11Troy at South Alabama6.8

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Sun Belt race →

If not the playoff, then

55%
Bowl eligible
53%
Placed in a bowl
0.3%
In the playoff
47%
Season over in November

South Alabama is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 1.3% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • New Orleans Bowl7.7%
  • Salute to Veterans Bowl7.5%
  • 68 Ventures Bowl6.8%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl6.4%
  • Frisco Bowl5.8%
  • Boca Raton Bowl5.5%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 9 have sent South Alabama a player since 2010 — 27 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of South Alabama's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
McGill ToolenAL81
HooverAL40
OxfordAL30
Pleasant GroveUT30
Hapeville CharterGA21
CallawayGA20
John CurtisLA20
Pine ForestFL20
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.