Skip to content
Bishop Davenport
Bishop Davenport

#4Bishop Davenport

Bishop Davenport is a Dual-Threat QB for South Alabama. Bishop's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 409 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bishop Davenport's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
200/294 Comp/Att2072 Pass yards12 Pass TD6 INT68.0% Comp %
Rushing
326 Rush yards9 Rush TD116 Carries2.8 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

27
Attempts
7.6y
Avg depth
4.2y
After catch
67%
Catch rate

The ball travels 7.6 yards in the air on an average throw about the median for the position. Another 4.2 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
1
0% · 0y
1
0% · 0y
short
6
83% · 42y
9
44% · 52y
10
90% · 60y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat94
  • Consistency72
  • Clutch85
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.82 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Georgia State (SP+ -25).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8200.82Wk 1 vs Morgan State: +0.48 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tulane: +0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Auburn: +0.31 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Coastal Carolina: -0.08 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs North Texas: +0.32 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Troy: +0.15 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Arkansas State: +0.06 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Georgia State: +0.82 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Louisiana: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs UL Monroe: +0.38 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Southern Miss: +0.34 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Texas State: -0.14 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMorgan StateW38-2112/141662010.5-1100.48
2vsTulaneL31-336.317/242312080.26310.32
3@AuburnL15-3111.618/261702181.02700.31
4vsCoastal CarolinaL20-38-15.122/361970211.2-230-0.08
5@North TexasL22-3613.817/341951148.35910.32
6@TroyL24-31-4.810/151042060.47210.15
8vsArkansas StateL14-15-8.818/231180017.0-1100.06
9@Georgia StateW38-31-24.516/222802092.61310.82
10vsLouisianaL22-31-10.120/332031154.84210.17
12@UL MonroeW26-14-21.617/231620047.35020.38
13vsSouthern MissW42-35-7.120/231510068.11520.34
14@Texas StateL26-492.313/21950114.4300-0.14

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
47.5%
Passing plays
94.9%
Rushing plays
18.0%
Standard downs
41.4%
Passing downs
61.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
0.21 / 0.37

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.