Skip to content

Alabama Crimson Tide

SEC·2-0·
Elo
1823#14
SP+
20.0#11
FPI
22.5
AP
#12
Nextvs Florida State · Wk 3Win prob 72%Model -9.0
Talent #4 (973.5)Recruiting class #226% production returning

Roster · 127 players

FR 30SO 27JR 34SR 36
#PlayerPosClHtWt
10Austin MackQBSR6'6"237
11Tayden-Evan KaawaQBFR6'5"238
12Keelon RussellQBSO6'3"207
13John GazzanigaQBSO6'7"241
15Jett ThomallaQBFR6'4"229
19John CooperQBJR6'2"205
0AK DearRBSO6'1"216
4Daniel HillRBJR6'1"234
6Kevin RileyRBJR5'11"198
13EJ CrowellRBFR5'11"224
17Trae'shawn BrownRBFR5'10"206
20Khalifa KeithRBSR6'1"232
25J'Alan TerryRBFR6'0"190
29Fredrick MooreRBJR5'9"170
29Jaron JacksonRBFR5'11"170
36TC WashingtonRBFR5'11"220
1Ryan Coleman-WilliamsWRJR6'0"184
3Lotzeir BrooksWRSO5'9"197
5Noah RogersWRSR6'2"206
7Rico ScottWRJR6'0"203
8Cederian MorganWRFR6'4"222
14Tyler HendersonWRJR6'1"177
21Maurice Mathis Jr.WRFR6'1"198
23MJ ChirgwinWRSR6'0"195
24Amari SabbWRFR5'9"155
26Aubrey WalkerWRFR5'10"170
27Elijah MurrayWRSR5'11"185
30Derek MeadowsWRSO6'5"212
31Cooper MollisonWRJR5'10"177
33Preston LandryWRSR6'4"210
37Tailan HallWRJR5'11"180
42Ben JacksonWRSO6'2"165
83Warner RossWRSR5'10"183
9Marshall PritchettTESO6'5"246
18Mack SutterTEFR6'5"248
40Josh FordTEJR6'6"266
46Peyton FoxTESR6'4"235
80Jaxon ShuttlesworthTEJR6'5"235
81Kaleb EdwardsTESO6'6"264
85Jack SammarcoTEJR6'5"268
86Jude CasconeTEFR6'3"224
87Danny LewisTESR6'5"260
88Jay LindseyTEJR6'5"258
50Casey PoeOLJR6'4"328
52Mal Waldrep Jr.OLSO6'5"324
53Mac SmithOLSR6'3"300
54Jayvin JamesOLSR6'5"317
55Racin DelgattyOLSR6'3"305
57Bear FretwellOLFR6'7"305
59JD MartinOLJR6'2"266
62Davis PetersonOLSR6'1"268
63Bryson CooleyOLFR6'6"328
64Michael CarrollOLSO6'6"324
65Tyrell MillerOLJR6'5"312
66Jared GrahamOLFR6'6"300
68Billy RobyOLSR5'11"280
69Baker HickmanOLSR6'3"334
70William SandersOLJR6'3"321
71Nick BrooksOLSO6'7"333
72Ty HaywoodOLSO6'5"318
73Chris BookerOLFR6'4"288
75Ethan FieldsOLSR6'3"313
77Jackson LloydOLSO6'7"326
79Kaden StrayhornOLSO6'2"310
1Devan ThompkinsDLSR6'5"300
14Fatutoa HenryDLSR6'4"272
22Kedrick Bingley-JonesDLSR6'4"302
25Steve Bolo MboumouaDLJR6'4"303
26Mhari JohnsonDLFR6'3"290
32Corey Howard Jr.DLFR6'6"288
44Nolan WilsonDLFR6'5"285
88Isaia FagaDLJR6'2"291
90London SimmonsDLSO6'3"300
91Caleb SmithDLSO6'5"280
92Jeremiah BeamanDLJR6'4"301
93Malique FranklinDLFR6'6"275
94Edric HillDLSR6'3"292
95Leslie BlackDLSR6'5"290
99Terrance GreenDLSR6'5"313
0Yhonzae PierreLBSR6'3"251
4Luke MetzLBSO6'3"235
7Caleb WoodsonLBSR6'3"240
8Justin HillLBSO6'3"245
9Desmond UmeozuluLBSR6'6"255
11Xavier GriffinLBFR6'3"228
15Duke Johnson IILBSO6'1"233
20Jah-Marien LathamLBSR6'3"273
23Cayden JonesLBJR6'4"233
30Bubba OdomLBSR6'4"240
34Zay HallLBFR6'3"236
35Abduall Sanders Jr.LBSO6'2"231
36QB ReeseLBJR6'0"230
39Jake IvieLBSR6'0"188
40Torin CraigLBJR6'2"180
41Jamarion MatthewsLBFR6'2"254
82Lane WhisenhuntLBSR6'2"225
2Zabien BrownDBJR6'0"194
3Keon SabbDBSR6'1"205
5Dijon Lee Jr.DBSO6'4"202
6Red MorganDBJR6'0"191
10Jireh EdwardsDBFR6'2"218
12Zavier MinceyDBJR6'3"206
13Ivan TaylorDBSO6'0"198
16Jorden EdmondsDBFR6'3"190
17Zyan GibsonDBFR6'0"195
18Bray HubbardDBSR6'2"215
19Chuck McDonald IIIDBSO6'1"199
21Dre Kirkpatrick Jr.DBJR5'11"207
24Rihyael KelleyDBFR6'3"205
27Walter Sansing IIIDBSR5'10"182
28Carmelo O'NealDBJR6'4"210
29Nick ShermanDBJR6'3"201
31George French IIDBFR6'1"195
32Griffin HansonDBJR5'10"177
34London HillDBJR5'11"185
38Brody McCutcheonDBSO6'1"180
43Camryn GableDBSO5'10"170
31Conor TaltyPKSR6'1"201
90Lorcan QuinnPKSO6'1"196
98Tucker CorneliusPKJR6'3"207
32Alex AsparuhovPSO6'3"202
33Adam WatfordPSR5'11"188
95Anderson GreenPJR6'0"201
45Jay WilliamsLSJR6'0"210
47Eli DeutschLSFR6'2"225
55Alex RozierLSSR6'4"215
61Ethan StangleLSSR6'1"219

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
46.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
13.5
scoring defense
Differential
+33.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
415.0#63
Yards / play
5.8#81
Passing yards / game
224.0#73
Rushing yards / game
191.0#51
First downs / game
24.5#36
3rd down %
50.0%#35
4th down %
100.0%#1
Time of possession
35:34#12
Defense
Yards allowed / game
185.5#16
Yards / play allowed
3.5#19
Pass yards allowed / game
153.0#49
Rush yards allowed / game
32.5#5
3rd down % allowed
4.3%#4
Sacks
7#6
Tackles for loss
11#41
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
0#66
Takeaways
4#14
Giveaways
4#118
Penalties / game
7.0#79
Penalty yards / game
37.0#30

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

heavily pass-leaning

Alabama throws it: Kalen DeBoer's offenses have been heavily pass-leaning across 6 seasons. The strengths are defensive, led by 10th at defending the pass.

On fourth down he goes for it more often than his peers do from the same spots (+4.9%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −14.1% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Alabama has played 2 games against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensethrowing it
    #10
    projected
  • Defensesacks and tackles for loss
    #11
    projected
  • Defensefirst and second down
    #12
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 9 to play
6.34.7
projected final record (now 20)
Exp. wins left
4.3
of 9 games
Bowl odds
71%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
72%
vs Florida State
Toughest
22%
vs Texas A&M

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 9 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

234567891011
final winstallest bar = 27% chance
Likeliest finish 6-5 (27%)Bowl eligible 71% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBKeelon Russell
+21.9 EPA
RBDaniel Hill, Kevin Riley +2
+12.8 EPA
WRRico Scott, Lotzeir Brooks +1
+7.3 EPA
TEKaleb Edwards, Marshall Pritchett
+0.2 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +21.90.331/play66 snaps
RBDaniel Hill
~$249K
EPA +10.10.335/play30 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.2753rd#65
Def-0.1792nd#12
Explosiveness
Off1.1632nd#94
Def1.1964th#50
Field position
Off64.715th#118
Def73.936th#88
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.8872nd#39
Def5.009th#125
Turnovers
Won 4Lost 4
Margin 0

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.2131st#95
Off · rush
0.3477th#32

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.3477th#32
Def-0.3292nd#12
Passing
Off0.2130th#97
Def-0.0489th#16

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.13#60
2nd-level / open-field
1.11 / 1.02
Power / stuff (off)
75.0% / 16.9%
Havoc — total (def)
20.4%#41
Havoc — front 7 / DB
13.9% / 6.5%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.21
Def-0.12
Pass downs
Off0.48
Def-0.26

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.10#620.20#730.68#56
Defense-0.14#490.09#68-0.60#2

Elo Trajectory

East CarolinaFinal
Elo rating 17381883+145 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.2961st
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.2088th
  • Offense success rate53%72nd
  • Defense success rate allowed22%92nd

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs54%66th
  • Offense success — passing downs48%85th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs20%96th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs25%55th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.129th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.510th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.8419th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.940th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.357th
  • Defense line yards allowed0.1399th
  • Offense highlight yards0.6738th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.0099th
  • Offense power success0.8369th
  • Defense power success allowed0.0099th
  • Offense stuff rate0.1745th
  • Defense stuff rate0.3793rd

Third down

  • Third down conversion53%69th
  • Third down distance faced7.139th
  • Third down conversion allowed0%99th
  • Third down distance forced9.490th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.2371st
  • Net success rate — second half0.3591st

Drives

  • Points per drive4.186th
  • Points per drive allowed0.2791st
  • Average starting field position3064th
  • Opponent starting field position2851st
  • Available yards gained67%81st
  • Available yards allowed23%91st
  • Scoring opportunities per drive90%70th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed73%68th
  • Points per scoring opportunity4.688th
  • Points allowed per opportunity1.385th
  • Three-and-out rate20%66th
  • Three-and-outs forced45%88th

Roster

  • Returning usage30%36th
  • Returning EPA12056th
  • Team talent composite97498th
  • Recruiting class rank2.099th
  • Recruiting class points30499th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.274#65 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.214#97
Rush EPA/play
+0.339#32
Explosiveness
1.162#94
Pts/opportunity
4.88#39
Success rate
50.8%

Rush efficiency edge: 0.125 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

High-pressure defense — top 9 nationally in EPA/play allowed
EPA/play allowed
-0.174#12 · top 20%
Havoc rate (total)
20.4%#41
Front-7 havoc
13.9%
DB havoc
6.5%
Big play rate allowed
1.187#50
Success rate allowed
29.2%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

46.5 PPG offense, 13.5 allowed — +33.0 margin/game
Points per game
46.5
Points allowed/game
13.5
Scoring margin/game
+33.0
Turnover margin
+0won 4 · lost 4
Production returning
26%
Talent rank (247)
#4

2-0 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE53thEXPLOSIVENESS32thFINISHING72thFIELD POS15thDEFENSE92thHAVOC71th50th100th
Offense
53th
Explosiveness
32th
Finishing
72th
Field Pos
15th
Defense
92th
Havoc
71th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+24.5
#8
Offense
+9.2
#20
Defense
-15.4
#4
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 10 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive4.100.27
Starting field positionown 30.0own 27.9
Available yards67.3%23.3%
Scoring opportunities90.0%72.7%
Points per opportunity4.561.25
Three-and-out rate20.0%45.5%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
39.5%
Expected, given the spots
50.1%
Over expected
-10.6
Fourth down vs peers
+19
Fourth down vs the model
+0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Alabama is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Alabama in 2026

by EPA/play distance
New MexicoSP+ +4.4
Off EPA/play +0.301Def EPA/play -0.150Elo 1558
Match
98%
James MadisonSP+ -0.3
Off EPA/play +0.303Def EPA/play -0.133Elo 1776
Match
97%
Texas TechSP+ +18.9
Off EPA/play +0.253Def EPA/play -0.125Elo 1870
Match
97%
Kansas StateSP+ +12.7
Off EPA/play +0.314Def EPA/play -0.219Elo 1616
Match
97%
LouisianaSP+ -5.7
Off EPA/play +0.311Def EPA/play -0.093Elo 1389
Match
95%
Texas A&MSP+ +23.9
Off EPA/play +0.224Def EPA/play -0.097Elo 1849
Match
95%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +35.0, #2 of 1282016: +44.4, #1 of 1282017: +37.5, #2 of 1302018: +49.7, #1 of 1302019: +41.5, #4 of 1302020: +37.6, #1 of 1242021: +35.5, #2 of 1302022: +30.5, #3 of 1312023: +24.8, #8 of 1332024: +18.3, #12 of 1342025: +20.6, #14 of 1362026: +24.5, #8 of 138
20152026
Now +24.5 · #8 of 138Best +49.7 in 2018Worst +18.3 in 2024

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.0+0.0
202511-47-1
73%
9.1+1.9
20249-45-3
69%
8.7+0.3
202312-29-0
86%
11.3+0.7
202211-26-2
85%
10.5+0.5
202113-28-1
87%
11.0+2.0
202013-011-0
100%
12.6+0.4
201911-26-2
85%
11.4-0.4
201814-19-0
93%
13.5+0.5
201713-18-1
93%
12.8+0.2

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

31%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-0 so far, projected to finish 8.3-3.9. Top-four bye in 9.9%. Wins the SEC in 7.4%.

If they finish with…

100%
0 losses
100%
1 loss
96%
2 losses
30%
3 losses
0.2%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 2.

Win out and it is 100%. Running the table settles it.

up 8.1 points since preseasonwon 48-10 over East Carolina against an expected margin of +22, so +15.7 against the number.

  • At 3 losses they are 30% where the average SEC team is 41%.
  • The SEC takes 3.83 bids in an average season, and four or more in 65%.

Alabama’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk10at LSU38.2
  • wk6vs Georgia34.9
  • wk8vs Texas A&M34.8
  • wk7at Tennessee32.5
  • wk4vs South Carolina31.3
  • wk11at Vanderbilt29.5

Who to root for

Games Alabama is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk9Navy over Notre Dame3.2
  • wk11Northwestern over Ohio State2.6
  • wk8Auburn over LSU2.6
  • wk3Arkansas over Georgia2.5
  • wk2Oklahoma State over Oregon2.3
  • wk7Auburn over Georgia2.3
The full playoff picture →

SEC

0-0 in league play, projected 5.4-3.65 of 16 by title odds
7.4%
Wins the SEC
16%
Reaches the title game

The SEC sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 48% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk10Alabama at LSU14.7
  • wk6Georgia at Alabama12.4
  • wk8Texas A&M at Alabama10.3
  • wk7Alabama at Tennessee9.7

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole SEC race →

If not the playoff, then

90%
Bowl eligible
60%
Placed in a bowl
31%
In the playoff
9.2%
Season over in November

Alabama is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 0.6% they go with five wins, as a 5-7 fill-in — which in reality is decided by academic progress rate, not by anything modelled here.

  • Citrus Bowl9.6%
  • ReliaQuest Bowl9.1%
  • Gator Bowl8.6%
  • Duke's Mayo Bowl7.9%
  • Music City Bowl6.8%
  • Texas Bowl6.2%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 26 have sent Alabama a player since 2010 — 63 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Alabama's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
IMG AcademyFL135
St. Frances AcademyMD61
Mater DeiCA51
DeMatha CatholicMD33
CarverGA31
McEachernGA31
North ShoreTX30
AuburnAL22
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.