Skip to content

South Carolina Gamecocks

SEC·2-0·
Elo
1742#21
SP+
16.7#19
FPI
15.8
AP
NR
Nextvs Mississippi State · Wk 3Win prob 74%Model -10.1
Talent #15 (862.9)Recruiting class #1469% production returning

Roster · 111 players

FR 39SO 25JR 23SR 24
#PlayerPosClHtWt
11Landon DuckworthQBFR6'4"215
12Cutter WoodsQBFR6'3"215
15Lucian Anderson IIIQBJR6'3"216
16LaNorris SellersQBJR6'3"238
19Brandon CunninghamQBFR6'1"185
25Jimmy FrancisQBSO5'10"190
4Isaiah AugustaveRBJR6'0"215
10Christian ClarkRBSO5'11"216
21Jabree ColemanRBFR6'1"215
22Jawarn HowellRBJR6'1"222
28Matt FullerRBSO5'11"221
31Neil Salvage IIIRBSO5'9"186
35Ethan KellumRBFR5'10"200
0Lex CyrusWRFR5'10"185
1Nitro TuggleWRJR6'1"195
3Mazeo Bennett Jr.WRJR5'10"185
6Donovan MurphWRSO6'2"199
7Jordon GidronWRFR6'2"197
8Nyck HarborWRSR6'5"239
9Jayden GibsonWRSR6'5"205
13Malik ClarkWRFR6'2"195
17Jayden SellersWRSO5'11"180
18Stone FurreyWRFR5'10"181
23Sequel PattersonWRFR5'11"180
82Jackson ReppWRFR5'8"175
83DJ BlackWRSR6'2"205
84Charly MullalyWRJR6'0"185
5Mike TylerTESO6'4"245
44Maurice Brown IITESR6'4"250
80Max DragTEJR6'4"248
81Reno RoehmTESO6'7"260
85Caden RamseyTEFR6'5"220
87Brady HuntTESR6'5"251
50Carter MillerOLSR6'2"311
51Ebubedike NnabugwuOLJR6'2"310
52Hank PurvisOLJR6'5"330
54Ashton MozoneOLJR6'4"310
55Adedamola AjidahunOLFR6'6"315
58Markee AndersonOLJR6'2"320
60Anthony BaxterOLFR6'4"340
62Nolan HayOLSR6'3"328
64Neff GiwaOLFR6'7"305
65Jacarrius PeakOLSR6'4"305
67Vincent ChenOLJR6'7"330
69Emmanuel Kojo PokuOLSR6'5"320
70Jake ReckerOLSO6'5"310
71Blake FranksOLSO6'5"325
72Shed Sarratt Jr.OLSO6'4"318
74Josiah ThompsonOLJR6'7"305
75Dayne ArnettOLSR6'5"300
76Zyon GuilesOLFR6'5"305
77Darius GrayOLFR6'3"302
78Seth SmithOLSR6'4"309
79Armando NievesOLSR6'6"315
6Dylan StewartDEJR6'5"250
10George Wilson Jr.DESR6'5"240
22Jaquavious DoddDEFR6'6"253
27Drew CollinsDESO6'2"246
39Caleb HerringDESR6'5"245
40Anthony AddisonDEFR6'4"230
41Kobby Sakyi-PrahDEFR6'2"231
55Julian WalkerDEFR6'6"255
11Jordan ThomasDLSO6'5"316
13Tomiwa DurojaiyeDLSR6'4"291
65Noah ClarkDLFR6'5"345
88Caleb WilliamsDLFR6'5"287
90Aiden HarrisDLFR6'2"286
95Christian IngramDLFR6'6"300
97Kelby CollinsDLSR6'4"285
99Gabriel Brownlow-DindyDLSR6'3"310
33Troy PikesDTJR6'3"293
0Fred JohnsonLBJR6'3"241
7Shawn MurphyLBSR6'3"233
15Donovan DardenLBSO6'4"240
17Justin OkoronkwoLBJR6'3"230
20Josh SmithLBFR6'2"234
24Keenan BrittLBFR6'0"238
30Andrew HarrisLBFR6'2"238
32A.J. HollowayLBFR6'2"232
34Jamian Risher Jr.LBSR6'1"238
1Gerald KilgoreDBSR6'0"208
3Kelvin HunterDBSO6'0"210
4Vicari SwainDBJR6'0"193
5Kendall Daniels Jr.DBSO6'4"213
8Judge CollierDBSR6'2"206
9David BuceyDBJR6'0"214
12Quay'sheed ScottDBJR5'11"208
14J'Zavien CurrenceDBFR6'4"215
16Jalewis SolomonDBSO6'1"195
18Jaquel HolmanDBSO6'1"214
19Damarcus LeachDBSO6'3"201
21Chris HatfieldDBFR6'2"215
23Triston LewisDBFR6'2"210
25Zahbari SandyDBJR6'2"208
26Isaiah McClaryDBSO6'1"175
28Kosci BarnesDBFR6'2"209
29Cedric CisseDBFR6'0"193
31Peyton WilliamsDBSR6'0"214
35Jackson BurgerDBSO6'1"209
36Landon KurtzDBSO6'2"200
43Tony BrownDBFR6'1"195
44KJ JohnsonDBFR6'1"175
Ethan JohnsonDBSR6'0"190
14Max KelleyPKSO6'2"225
24Mason LovePKSO6'0"195
27Upton BellenfantPKSR6'0"180
32Malik OrsanPKFR6'1"210
29Gunnar YocumLSSO6'0"201
53Emmet RhoadesLSJR5'11"225
57Kyler FarrowLSFR6'2"221
59Matthew OhLSFR5'9"215

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
51.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
4.5
scoring defense
Differential
+46.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
645.0#3
Yards / play
9.0#7
Passing yards / game
367.0#7
Rushing yards / game
278.0#16
First downs / game
35.0#2
3rd down %
87.5%#1
4th down %
Time of possession
34:47#16
Defense
Yards allowed / game
179.0#15
Yards / play allowed
3.7#25
Pass yards allowed / game
79.0#5
Rush yards allowed / game
100.0#56
3rd down % allowed
35.7%#73
Sacks
1#104
Tackles for loss
4#114
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+1#36
Takeaways
1#88
Giveaways
0#1
Penalties / game
3.0#6
Penalty yards / game
25.0#7

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

South Carolina is in year 6 under Shane Beamer, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are on both sides of the ball, led by 8th at defending the run.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+2.5%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −21.2% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

South Carolina has played 1 game against a genuinely tough slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defenserunning it
    #8
    projected
  • Defensegetting stopped at the line
    #15
    projected
  • Offensehitting chunk plays
    #20
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
7.14.9
projected final record (now 20)
Exp. wins left
5.1
of 10 games
Bowl odds
87%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
82%
vs Kentucky
Toughest
23%
vs Texas A&M

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

23456789101112
final winstallest bar = 27% chance
Likeliest finish 7-5 (27%)Bowl eligible 87% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
WRNyck Harbor, Mazeo Bennett +4
+16.8 EPA
QBLanorris Sellers
+16.1 EPA
RBChristian Clark, Jabree Coleman +1
+9.7 EPA
TEBrady Hunt, Mike Tyler
-0.3 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +16.10.767/play21 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.7498th#4
Def0.0559th#57
Explosiveness
Off1.3364th#50
Def1.3825th#104
Field position
Off80.199th#2
Def76.216th#116
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off7.0099th#1
Def0.0099th#2
Turnovers
Won 1Lost 0
Margin +1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.7892nd#12
Off · rush
0.6896th#6

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.6896th#6
Def-0.1474th#37
Passing
Off0.7892nd#12
Def0.0377th#33

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
4.40#6
2nd-level / open-field
1.69 / 5.50
Power / stuff (off)
100.0% / 6.3%
Havoc — total (def)
14.3%#92
Havoc — front 7 / DB
8.2% / 6.1%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.63
Def-0.05
Pass downs
Off1.07
Def0.17

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.67#50.33#532.00#2
Defense0.03#89-0.54#20.60#98

Elo Trajectory

Kent StateFinal
Elo rating 16311763+132 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.6899th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.0466th
  • Offense success rate69%99th
  • Defense success rate allowed27%85th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs71%97th
  • Offense success — passing downs58%96th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs35%76th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs17%82nd

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.250th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.519th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.052nd
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.482nd

Trenches

  • Offense line yards4.188th
  • Defense line yards allowed2.750th
  • Offense highlight yards2.586th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed1.233rd
  • Offense power success0.8369th
  • Defense power success allowed0.5079th
  • Offense stuff rate0.0888th
  • Defense stuff rate0.2153rd

Third down

  • Third down conversion89%99th
  • Third down distance faced6.657th
  • Third down conversion allowed36%52nd
  • Third down distance forced7.660th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.3785th
  • Net success rate — second half0.5299th

Drives

  • Points per drive6.299th
  • Points per drive allowed0.0098th
  • Average starting field position202nd
  • Opponent starting field position2481st
  • Available yards gained91%98th
  • Available yards allowed23%92nd
  • Scoring opportunities per drive100%99th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed78%58th
  • Points per scoring opportunity6.299th
  • Points allowed per opportunity0.0099th
  • Three-and-out rate0%99th
  • Three-and-outs forced33%70th

Roster

  • Returning usage68%79th
  • Returning EPA14862nd
  • Team talent composite86390th
  • Recruiting class rank14.091st
  • Recruiting class points25691st

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Balanced attack — top 3 nationally by EPA/play
EPA/play
+0.742#4 · elite
Pass EPA/play
+0.784#12
Rush EPA/play
+0.682#6
Explosiveness
1.326#50
Pts/opportunity
7.00#1
Success rate
66.7%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.102 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

EPA/play allowed
+0.045#57 · average
Havoc rate (total)
14.3%#92
Front-7 havoc
8.2%
DB havoc
6.1%
Big play rate allowed
1.382#104
Success rate allowed
30.3%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

51.0 PPG offense, 4.5 allowed — +46.5 margin/game
Points per game
51.0
Points allowed/game
4.5
Scoring margin/game
+46.5
Turnover margin
+1won 1 · lost 0
Production returning
69%
Talent rank (247)
#15

2-0 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE98thEXPLOSIVENESS64thFINISHING100thFIELD POS99thDEFENSE59thHAVOC34th50th100th
Offense
98th
Explosiveness
64th
Finishing
100th
Field Pos
99th
Defense
59th
Havoc
34th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+23.8
#9
Offense
+11.8
#9
Defense
-12.0
#9
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 9 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive6.220.00
Starting field positionown 19.7own 23.7
Available yards91.5%23.1%
Scoring opportunities100.0%77.8%
Points per opportunity6.220.00
Three-and-out rate0.0%33.3%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
55.9%
Expected, given the spots
49.6%
Over expected
+6.3
Fourth down vs peers
-0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. South Carolina is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to South Carolina in 2026

by EPA/play distance
MiamiSP+ +24.7
Off EPA/play +0.802Def EPA/play +0.013Elo 1930
Match
97%
IndianaSP+ +24.1
Off EPA/play +0.656Def EPA/play +0.010Elo 2113
Match
96%
NevadaSP+ -6.1
Off EPA/play +0.637Def EPA/play -0.000Elo 1462
Match
94%
SMUSP+ +11.1
Off EPA/play +0.557Def EPA/play +0.037Elo 1728
Match
91%
FloridaSP+ +18.6
Off EPA/play +0.611Def EPA/play -0.073Elo 1658
Match
91%
BYUSP+ +16.8
Off EPA/play +0.520Def EPA/play +0.039Elo 1666
Match
90%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -5.2, #84 of 1282016: -5.5, #88 of 1282017: +8.5, #37 of 1302018: +6.3, #38 of 1302019: +0.0, #62 of 1302020: -14.5, #110 of 1242021: +2.6, #61 of 1302022: +6.1, #42 of 1312023: +1.1, #54 of 1332024: +19.1, #10 of 1342025: +5.3, #53 of 1362026: +23.8, #9 of 138
20152026
Now +23.8 · #9 of 138Best +23.8 in 2026Worst -14.5 in 2020

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.0+0.0
20254-81-7
33%
4.1-0.1
20249-45-3
69%
10.0-1.0
20235-73-5
42%
5.6-0.6
20228-54-4
62%
6.8+1.2
20217-63-5
54%
6.9+0.1
20202-82-8
20%
2.7-0.7
20194-83-5
33%
4.3-0.3
20187-64-4
54%
5.6+1.4
20179-45-3
69%
7.7+1.3

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

16%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-0 so far, projected to finish 7.2-4.8. Top-four bye in 4.0%. Wins the SEC in 2.9%.

If they finish with…

100%
0 losses
100%
1 loss
95%
2 losses
29%
3 losses
0.2%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 2.

Win out and it is 100%. Running the table settles it.

up 6.9 points since preseasonwon 57-0 over Kent State against an expected margin of +37, so +19.6 against the number.

  • At 3 losses they are 29% where the average SEC team is 41%.
  • The SEC takes 3.83 bids in an average season, and four or more in 65%.

South Carolina’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk9at Oklahoma25.7
  • wk4at Alabama25.4
  • wk12vs Georgia25.2
  • wk6at Florida24.1
  • wk10vs Texas A&M23.9
  • wk8vs Tennessee20.6

Who to root for

Games South Carolina is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk3Florida State over Alabama2.3
  • wk13Syracuse over Notre Dame1.7
  • wk9Mississippi State over Texas1.6
  • wk2Kent State over Wofford1.6
  • wk2Oregon State over Texas Tech1.4
  • wk11Kent State over Bowling Green1.3
The full playoff picture →

SEC

0-0 in league play, projected 4.6-4.49 of 16 by title odds
2.9%
Wins the SEC
7.8%
Reaches the title game

The SEC sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 48% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk12Georgia at South Carolina6.6
  • wk4South Carolina at Alabama5.9
  • wk9South Carolina at Oklahoma5.5
  • wk6South Carolina at Florida5.3

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole SEC race →

If not the playoff, then

79%
Bowl eligible
64%
Placed in a bowl
16%
In the playoff
20%
Season over in November

South Carolina is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 1.1% they go with five wins, as a 5-7 fill-in — which in reality is decided by academic progress rate, not by anything modelled here.

  • Music City Bowl8.4%
  • Duke's Mayo Bowl8.2%
  • Texas Bowl8.1%
  • Gator Bowl7.8%
  • ReliaQuest Bowl7.6%
  • Citrus Bowl7.0%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 7 have sent South Carolina a player since 2010 — 18 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of South Carolina's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
StephensonGA52
McEachernGA31
NorthwesternFL30
ConwayAR22
Hapeville CharterGA21
EastsideGA20
ParkwayLA11
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.