Skip to content

Colorado State Rams

Pac-12·2-0·
Elo
1336#109
SP+
-7.5#98
FPI
-7.9
AP
NR
Nextvs BYU · Wk 3Win prob 5%Model +24.2
Talent #75 (640.3)Recruiting class #7340% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on Colorado State

All news

Hauss Hejny was responsible for 30 of Colorado State's 35 points

Matchup · 6d ago

Wyoming's edge rides on a quarterback nobody has seen

Matchup · Sep 2

Roster · 114 players

FR 33SO 17JR 29SR 35
#PlayerPosClHtWt
2K'saan FarrarQBSO6'3"215
3Darius CurryQBJR5'10"165
8Hauss HejnyQBSO6'0"206
13Tommy PoholskyQBSR6'1"210
16Darnell KellyQBFR
19Carter EmanuelQBFR
1Mel BrownRBSR5'9"180
7Malichi GreavesRBSO5'9"190
11Durell RobinsonRBSR6'0"207
22Cedric RossRBFR
23Damian Moore Jr.RBFR
24Jayden FoxRBFR5'9"170
34Amare GomezRBSO5'9"180
44Oliver LundbergRBJR5'10"200
0RJ VickWRSR6'3"198
4Lavon BrownWRSR6'0"195
6Jackson HarperWRSR6'2"200
9Jordan MosleyWRSR6'0"195
10Tommy MaherWRJR5'10"170
15Terrence Smith Jr.WRSO5'11"170
20Jaivyn MooreWRJR
25Eli RichWRFR
28Hudson CocchiaraWRFR
29Brandon Brown Jr.WRFR
81Troy FosterWRFR
82Daven AmosWRSO
83Yasser JacksonWRFR
84Stephon DailyWRJR6'3"180
86Isaiah WatsonWRFR
87Antoine Martin Jr.WRSO5'11"170
5Juice VereenTESR6'4"220
17Brock CampTESO6'5"250
18Pearce Spurlin IIITEJR6'7"230
26Ryan McConnellTESR6'1"225
30Dominic ToyTEJR6'6"225
85Grant HouserTESO6'6"230
88Nader ChirchiTESR6'7"265
50Jayden TuiaOLJR6'5"298
52Kentez AllenOLSO6'2"295
54Quinton HarrisOLSR6'8"315
61Diego RodriguezOLJR6'5"290
62Packs AhoveloOLFR
63John HolthausOLJR6'7"285
64Mason TurpinOLFR
65Phillip OconOLJR6'3"300
68Jeremiah CostillaOLJR
70Berlin LillardOLJR6'4"365
71Zach SmithOLJR6'8"300
72Max VivierOLFR
73Braden HalesOLJR6'5"305
74Payton StewartOLJR6'6"308
75Sione NetaneOLSO6'3"350
76Toriyan JohnsonOLSR6'8"330
78Uluaki TatafuOLFR
79Luke Van AukenOLFR
9Stephon WrightDLSR6'5"285
10Brandon KelleyDLSR6'6"235
52Cleto CholDLSR6'6"270
55Desman ManuelDLFR
58Peyton GarrettDLJR6'2"230
71Ismael El BouomraniDLSO
77Jack MoranDLJR6'6"255
90Keegan ShankDLJR6'4"255
92Mukendi Wa-KalonjiDLSR6'4"250
93Robby HarrisonDLSR6'4"320
94Alton Tarber IVDLSR6'4"330
95Gabe JonesDLJR6'4"290
96Tyrone FittenDLFR
97Amare BellDLFR
99TaVeon RobinsonDLJR
2Oumar DiomandeLBSR6'1"230
8Antarron TurnerLBSR6'1"244
11Khamani PottsLBSR
16Ace BrownLBFR
19Nykobi BrownLBSO6'3"250
23Jaseim MitchellLBSR6'1"225
27Jaylen KingLBFR
28Marc PrettoLBSR6'2"225
31Mickey WilliamsLBFR
34Trey DennisonLBFR
35Jaden HernandezLBFR
36Dakota RichLBFR
45Caleb OtlewskiLBSR6'4"235
50Josh AyersLBSR6'2"205
54Cannon ValenzuelaLBSO6'3"200
56Kenyon AgursLBSR6'4"240
0Caleb PresleyCBJR6'0"177
5D'Angelo Hagans Jr.CBSO6'0"195
6Elijah BrownCBJR6'2"185
7Jordan LessardCBSR
17CJ BlockerCBSR6'0"180
20Jayden CortellCBSR5'11"180
22Makih JohnsonCBSO6'2"185
26Thomas Cook Jr.CBFR
29Xavier WimbushCBFR
30Kallen MartinezCBFR
32Justin LewisCBFR
33Ty StaplesCBFR
1D'Mon BrinsonSSR5'10"180
3Dagan MyersSJR5'10"185
4Dylan PhelpsSSR6'3"190
12Jace BellahSSR5'11"190
13Elijah Mc-CantosSSR6'0"190
15Tre'Shawn MooreSJR6'1"190
18AJ NolandSJR6'1"185
24Trey VincentSSR6'3"185
25Jermaine Santana-DiazSFR
44Atticus TillmanSFR
36Casey CarrPKSO6'1"190
40Kali NgumaPKJR5'10"186
39Nathan SutcliffePJR6'6"245
99Cavan CraigPJR5'11"190
42Declan McKernanLSFR
56Walker HimebauchLSSR6'1"225

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
46.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
18.5
scoring defense
Differential
+28.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
396.0#71
Yards / play
5.9#73
Passing yards / game
242.0#61
Rushing yards / game
154.0#72
First downs / game
18.0#102
3rd down %
46.7%#51
4th down %
100.0%#1
Time of possession
29:19#83
Defense
Yards allowed / game
273.0#52
Yards / play allowed
5.2#76
Pass yards allowed / game
130.0#29
Rush yards allowed / game
143.0#92
3rd down % allowed
0.0%#1
Sacks
2#81
Tackles for loss
6#91
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+4#9
Takeaways
4#14
Giveaways
0#1
Penalties / game
4.0#19
Penalty yards / game
36.0#29

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

Colorado State is in year 1 under Jim Mora, whose offenses have been balanced. The way in is 131st at closing out passing downs, and they are 130th at holding the line of scrimmage.

On fourth down he goes for it less often than his peers do from the same spots (−3.6%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −40.4% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Colorado State has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected soft spots

  • Defensesurviving second and twelve
    #131
    projected
  • Defensethe push the line gets
    #130
    projected
  • Defensethrowing it
    #129
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 9 to play
4.26.8
projected final record (now 20)
Exp. wins left
2.2
of 9 games
Bowl odds
13%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
61%
vs Oregon State
Toughest
5%
vs BYU

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 9 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

234567891011
final winstallest bar = 32% chance
Likeliest finish 4-7 (32%)Bowl eligible 13% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
WRLavon Brown, Jackson Harper +4
+38.4 EPA
QBHauss Hejny
+38.1 EPA
RBDurell Robinson, Jayden Brown +1
+22.7 EPA
TEPearce Spurlin III, Javonte Vereen +1
-4.9 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
QBHauss Hejny
~$1.0M
EPA +38.10.508/play75 snaps
RBJayden Brown
~$257K
EPA +12.30.560/play22 snaps
EPA +1.80.078/play23 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.3058th#58
Def-0.0373rd#38
Explosiveness
Off1.2142nd#81
Def0.9098th#4
Field position
Off65.618th#113
Def72.453rd#66
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.6766th#47
Def2.6072nd#40
Turnovers
Won 8Lost 1
Margin +7

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.5477th#33
Off · rush
0.0634th#91

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.0634th#91
Def0.0841st#82
Passing
Off0.5477th#33
Def0.1167th#46

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.49#112
2nd-level / open-field
1.03 / 1.36
Power / stuff (off)
100.0% / 21.2%
Havoc — total (def)
25.5%#11
Havoc — front 7 / DB
14.5% / 10.9%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.21
Def-0.06
Pass downs
Off0.58
Def0.08

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.16#1200.42#380.78#40
Defense0.04#930.26#97-0.47#3

Elo Trajectory

WyomingFinal
Elo rating 12731327+54 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.3062nd
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.0364th
  • Offense success rate49%60th
  • Defense success rate allowed42%32nd

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs51%51st
  • Offense success — passing downs41%73rd
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs48%34th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs23%59th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.250th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed0.9093rd
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.049th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.948th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards2.519th
  • Defense line yards allowed3.412th
  • Offense highlight yards1.463rd
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.6155th
  • Offense power success1.099th
  • Defense power success allowed1.023rd
  • Offense stuff rate0.2126th
  • Defense stuff rate0.1214th

Third down

  • Third down conversion47%55th
  • Third down distance faced5.974th
  • Third down conversion allowed0%99th
  • Third down distance forced10.095th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half-0.0331st
  • Net success rate — second half0.0547th

Drives

  • Points per drive3.578th
  • Points per drive allowed1.078th
  • Average starting field position2957th
  • Opponent starting field position2759th
  • Available yards gained58%69th
  • Available yards allowed35%82nd
  • Scoring opportunities per drive100%99th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed70%75th
  • Points per scoring opportunity3.571st
  • Points allowed per opportunity1.481st
  • Three-and-out rate40%22nd
  • Three-and-outs forced50%91st

Roster

  • Returning usage31%39th
  • Returning EPA79.640th
  • Team talent composite64046th
  • Recruiting class rank73.047th
  • Recruiting class points18947th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.301#58 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.537#33
Rush EPA/play
+0.064#91
Explosiveness
1.209#81
Pts/opportunity
4.67#47
Success rate
48.5%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.473 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

High-pressure defense suppressing opponents below the national average
EPA/play allowed
-0.025#38 · above avg
Havoc rate (total)
25.5%#11
Front-7 havoc
14.5%
DB havoc
10.9%
Big play rate allowed
0.900#4
Success rate allowed
41.8%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

46.5 PPG offense, 18.5 allowed — +28.0 margin/game
Points per game
46.5
Points allowed/game
18.5
Scoring margin/game
+28.0
Turnover margin
+7won 8 · lost 1
Production returning
40%
Talent rank (247)
#75

2-0 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE58thEXPLOSIVENESS42thFINISHING66thFIELD POS18thDEFENSE73thHAVOC93th50th100th
Offense
58th
Explosiveness
42th
Finishing
66th
Field Pos
18th
Defense
73th
Havoc
93th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-5.4
#89
Offense
+0.1
#57
Defense
+5.5
#120
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 10 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive3.501.00
Starting field positionown 29.3own 26.8
Available yards57.6%34.6%
Scoring opportunities100.0%70.0%
Points per opportunity3.501.43
Three-and-out rate40.0%50.0%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
50.8%
Expected, given the spots
40.9%
Over expected
+9.9
Fourth down vs peers
+5
Fourth down vs the model
-25
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Colorado State is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Colorado State in 2026

by EPA/play distance
Iowa StateSP+ +3.1
Off EPA/play +0.303Def EPA/play -0.038Elo 1586
Match
99%
North CarolinaSP+ +5.8
Off EPA/play +0.330Def EPA/play -0.045Elo 1398
Match
98%
DelawareSP+ -7.6
Off EPA/play +0.250Def EPA/play -0.032Elo 1404
Match
98%
MissouriSP+ +12.9
Off EPA/play +0.319Def EPA/play +0.020Elo 1703
Match
97%
ToledoSP+ -9.4
Off EPA/play +0.360Def EPA/play -0.023Elo 1568
Match
97%
MarylandSP+ +9.1
Off EPA/play +0.348Def EPA/play -0.059Elo 1424
Match
97%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -7.5, #89 of 1282016: +0.1, #63 of 1282017: -6.4, #84 of 1302018: -12.9, #105 of 1302019: -3.6, #72 of 1302020: -1.4, #70 of 1242021: +2.5, #62 of 1302022: -17.8, #118 of 1312023: -16.5, #114 of 1332024: -5.1, #86 of 1342025: -19.4, #123 of 1362026: -5.4, #89 of 138
20152026
Now -5.4 · #89 of 138Best +2.5 in 2021Worst -19.4 in 2025

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.0+0.0
20252-101-7
17%
3.1-1.1
20248-56-1
62%
6.9+1.1
20235-73-5
42%
4.6+0.4
20223-93-5
25%
4.0-1.0
20213-92-6
25%
6.1-3.1
20201-31-3
25%
0.9+0.1
20194-83-5
33%
5.3-1.3
20183-92-6
25%
3.1-0.1
20177-65-3
54%
7.3-0.3

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.6%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-0 so far, projected to finish 5.1-6.0. Wins the Pac-12 in 3.9%.

If they finish with…

58%
1 loss
6.0%
2 losses
0.1%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 1.

up 0.4 points since preseasonwon 35-13 over Wyoming against an expected margin of +2, so +20.4 against the number.

  • At 1 loss they are 58% where the average Pac-12 team is 71%.
  • The Pac-12 takes 0.22 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.6% of seasons, having won their league in 89% of those.

Colorado State’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk3vs BYU3.0
  • wk10vs Boise State2.3
  • wk4at UTSA1.6
  • wk11at Washington State1.4
  • wk8vs San Diego State1.3
  • wk12at Fresno State1.2

Who to root for

Games Colorado State is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk10Wyoming over UNLV0.3
  • wk5North Carolina over Notre Dame0.3
  • wk11Hawai'i over North Dakota State0.3
  • wk9UNLV over Northern Illinois0.2
  • wk12Georgia Southern over Troy0.2
  • wk11UCLA over Illinois0.2
The full playoff picture →

Pac-12

0-0 in league play, projected 2.7-4.37 of 8 by title odds
3.9%
Wins the Pac-12
11%
Reaches the title game

The Pac-12 sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 38% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk10Boise State at Colorado State11.5
  • wk8San Diego State at Colorado State7.4
  • wk11Colorado State at Washington State6.9
  • wk12Colorado State at Fresno State6.4

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Pac-12 race →

If not the playoff, then

40%
Bowl eligible
39%
Placed in a bowl
0.6%
In the playoff
61%
Season over in November

Colorado State is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • Sun Bowl11%
  • Holiday Bowl10%
  • Las Vegas Bowl8.2%
  • Alamo Bowl6.1%
  • Independence Bowl3.0%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 8 have sent Colorado State a player since 2010 — 22 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Colorado State's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
Dr. PhillipsFL50
Long Beach PolyCA40
Valor ChristianCO40
Blue SpringsMO20
NavarreFL20
NevilleLA20
SkylineTX20
RockwallTX10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.