Colorado State vs. UTSA Prediction, Odds & Pick
Prediction, odds and the model's read
Our model's read
Scouting report
2026 projection · last season, roster and staff
Where Colorado State gets at UTSA: 76th at hitting chunk plays, against a unit 126th at keeping everything in front of them. Where UTSA gets at Colorado State: 18th at staying on schedule through the air, against a unit 129th at keeping opponents off schedule through the air. UTSA is also 24th at surviving second and twelve, against a unit 133rd.
How
CSUattacks
UTSA
- 1
Take shots
hitting chunk plays · projected
CSU#76 of 138UTSA#126 of 138
HowUTSAattacksCSU
- 1
Stay on schedule through the air
staying on schedule through the air · projected
UTSA#18 of 138CSU#129 of 138 - 2
Trust the offense behind schedule
surviving second and twelve · projected
UTSA#24 of 138CSU#133 of 138 - 3
Finish drives in the red zone
turning trips inside the 40 into points · projected
UTSA#21 of 138CSU#130 of 138
The two teams
Colorado State
Colorado State is in year 1 under Jim Mora, whose offenses have been balanced. The way in is 133rd at closing out passing downs, and they are 132nd at generating havoc.
On fourth down he goes for it less often than his peers do from the same spots (−3.6%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −39.6% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.
Colorado State has played 2 games against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.
Projected soft spots
- Defensesurviving second and twelve#133projected
- Defensesacks and tackles for loss#132projected
- Defensethe push the line gets#131projected
UTSA
UTSA throws it: Jeff Traylor's offenses have been pass-leaning across 6 seasons. The strengths are offensive, led by 18th at staying on schedule through the air. The way in is 126th at keeping everything in front of them.
On fourth down he goes for it more often than his peers do from the same spots (+3.6%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −15.6% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.
UTSA has played 2 games against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.
Projected strengths
- Offensestaying on schedule through the air#18projected
- Offenseturning trips inside the 40 into points#21projected
- Offensesurviving second and twelve#24projected
Projected soft spots
- Defensehitting chunk plays#126projected
Ranks are national. Nothing here is last season's number — carrying one forward is measurably worse than saying nothing — and in-season figures are adjusted for who was actually played. This describes the matchup; it is not a prediction and not a pick.
Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.
Model prediction
how the number is builtOur model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (UTSA Elo 1525, CSU Elo 1336 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects UTSA -11.4 (75% to win), essentially in line with the market.
Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).
Model as of Sep 1 · through week 1 · drive simulation
Where the game is won
2026 national rank · right is better
offensethe defense it faces
Moving the ball
CSU13th97thUTSAUTSA32nd115thCSUThrough the air
CSU24th87thUTSAUTSA43rd57thCSUOn the ground
CSU29th133rdUTSAUTSA44th111thCSUStaying on the field
CSU33rd115thUTSAUTSA129th31stCSUTaking care of it
CSU21st9thUTSAUTSA1st1stCSU
Each bar runs from last in the country on the left to 1st on the right. The filled span is the gap between the offense and the defense it faces.
Season form — 2026
nationally rankedThe matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profiles| CSU | UTSA | |
|---|---|---|
| -5.4 (#94) | CORE overall | +4.6 (#53) |
| +0 / +6 | offense / defense | +3 / -1 |
| 3.50 | points / drive | 2.82 |
| 1.00 | allowed / drive | 2.46 |
| 40% | three-and-outs | 36% |
| +10 | pass over expected | +7 |
Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.
Key matchups
The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.
Create a free account →You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.
FAQ
Who will win Colorado State vs. UTSA?
Gridpex's model favors UTSA with a 75% win probability.
What's the predicted spread for Colorado State vs. UTSA?
The model projects UTSA by 11.4.
What time is Colorado State vs. UTSA and what channel is it on?
Time TBD, at Alamodome.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →