Skip to content

Akron Zips

Mid-American·1-1·
Elo
929#138
SP+
-21.4#128
FPI
-16.8
AP
NR
Next@ Minnesota · Wk 3Win prob 12%Model +18.7
Talent #121 (546.8)Recruiting class #13392% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on Akron

All news

Carlos Hernandez went for 165 receiving yards for Wake Forest

Matchup · Sep 4

Jordan Gant Runs at the One Wake Forest Unit That Stayed

Matchup · Aug 31

Roster · 105 players

FR 26SO 27JR 25SR 27
#PlayerPosClHtWt
6Brayden RoggowQBSO6'4"205
7Reese PoffenbargerQBSR6'1"215
10Semaj BealsQBFR6'1"190
11Cibastian BroughtonQBFR5'11"175
18Johnny BrookhartQBJR5'11"205
1Jordan GantRBSR5'10"205
13Sean PatrickRBSO5'11"180
24Marquese WilliamsRBJR5'9"180
25Chris GeeRBJR5'10"210
26Taven CurryRBSR6'0"215
28Luke ReedRBSO5'10"190
2Marcel WilliamsWRSO5'11"200
3Kyan MasonWRSO5'9"155
4Miles BurrisWRJR6'3"205
5Titus MyersWRJR6'2"180
8Brandon HillsWRJR5'10"180
9Jean Louis IIIWRJR5'8"185
12Cameron MonteiroWRSO6'1"190
14Luke SivonWRFR6'0"200
15Jaborree RigginsWRFR6'3"185
16Paul DavisWRSO6'0"200
80Jalen HightowerWRSO5'11"190
82Troy HazudaWRFR6'0"200
87Gentz HilburnWRSO5'10"195
88Dominic MonzWRSO5'7"175
23Yaseen DeReeseTEFR6'3"225
81Nick WilsonTESO6'1"225
83Elijah AlexanderTESO6'4"235
84Wyatt HookTESO6'6"265
85Conner CravaackTEJR6'4"245
50Allen Jones Jr.OLSR6'4"290
51Jason HoskinsOLJR6'3"345
52Nate HamptonOLFR6'3"300
53Alex FoxOLSR6'3"290
55Amarie ArcherOLSR6'3"300
56Brandon SmithOLJR6'2"310
57Ian FalknerOLSR6'3"300
61Jon StephensOLSO6'3"285
62Max MobleyOLJR6'2"290
63August WeightOLFR6'4"245
68Jonathan GouldOLFR6'5"270
70Melvin PuckettOLSO6'3"300
71Carlos SlaydenOLSR6'4"300
72Colin LyonsOLSR6'3"295
73Jonas MannOLSO6'7"310
75Dayne ShorOLJR6'5"325
77Lorvens BarthelemyOLFR6'4"325
78Daxton Christman-GourleyOLSO6'6"275
79Nick StopiakOLSR6'6"315
16Dahvon FrazierDESO6'2"230
50Jahvon FrazierDESO6'3"230
56Omari AborDESR6'4"250
90Kurtis WayeDESR6'4"240
92Israel DuncanDESR6'2"240
96Brandon Tobias IIDESO6'5"250
97Vann KavalsDEFR6'5"265
1Cyrus DurhamDLJR6'3"245
5Ronald HullDLJR6'2"300
8Jon'Trell MixonDLJR6'4"285
44Jasun RidleyDLJR6'2"260
51Omari BivensDLFR6'0"255
57Elijah DavisDLSO6'1"300
65Logan HindmarchDLFR5'9"240
93Ty WatkinsDLFR6'5"240
94Malakai Ross-GravesDLJR6'3"280
99Jaiden Brown-DemeryDLFR6'4"310
52Vaughn HighlandDTSR6'1"315
55Jalen WilliamsDTSR6'6"340
7Jeremiah JonesLBJR6'0"235
18Dwight NunooLBSR6'1"230
19Eddie Smith IIILBJR6'0"230
23Daunte CurtisLBFR6'1"205
25Jason HockerLBSO6'0"230
31Gavin JamesLBFR6'0"220
32Donelius JohnsonLBSR6'0"225
34Cam MaconLBSR5'11"220
42Jude BuchananLBSR6'1"235
45Devin ReevesLBFR6'0"235
4Zach HobsonCBSR6'3"195
11Dawayne Galloway Jr.CBFR6'0"170
17Caiden NewsomeCBJR6'0"180
22Henry PerrymondCBFR5'11"175
24Savion LewisCBFR5'11"175
3Alex BranchDBSR6'0"190
9Aamii BranchDBJR5'10"180
12Iesa JarmonDBSR6'0"185
14Khory MossDBFR5'11"190
20Mehki FlowersDBSR6'0"200
21Catrell WhiteDBJR5'11"175
27Keyveon JohnsonDBSO6'2"185
29Tairan Davis Jr.DBSO5'11"185
30Terry Lee Jr.DBFR6'0"175
35Rod Smith Jr.DBFR5'10"175
43Austin WondolowskiDBJR5'10"205
2Daymon DavidSSR6'0"210
6Jamari SomervilleSJR5'11"195
13Rodrick HunterSSO5'11"190
15Terence ThomasSSR5'9"190
37Aidan StirePKFR6'0"195
40Jordan WestrichPKSO5'11"170
47Matthew SchrammPKSO5'9"180
95Joseph CastlePSR6'2"205
36Charlie VolpeLSFR6'0"190
41Stone DeanLSJR6'3"220
49Frank MinerLSSR6'2"205

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
30.5
scoring offense
Points allowed
24.0
scoring defense
Differential
+6.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
414.0#66
Yards / play
5.9#77
Passing yards / game
219.0#79
Rushing yards / game
195.0#48
First downs / game
24.0#40
3rd down %
45.8%#56
4th down %
33.3%#97
Time of possession
32:55#37
Defense
Yards allowed / game
376.5#94
Yards / play allowed
6.4#116
Pass yards allowed / game
268.0#116
Rush yards allowed / game
108.5#69
3rd down % allowed
40.7%#92
Sacks
1#104
Tackles for loss
7#77
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
0#66
Takeaways
2#53
Giveaways
2#68
Penalties / game
6.5#71
Penalty yards / game
51.5#66

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

balanced

Akron is in year 5 under Joe Moorhead, whose offenses have been balanced. The way in is 119th at running it, and they are 118th at surviving second and twelve.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (−1.7%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −25.5% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Akron has played 2 games against a soft slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected soft spots

  • Offenserunning it
    #119
    projected
  • Offensesurviving second and twelve
    #118
    projected
  • Offensefirst and second down
    #109
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
6.25.8
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
5.2
of 10 games
Bowl odds
69%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
90%
vs Massachusetts
Toughest
12%
vs Minnesota

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 27% chance
Likeliest finish 6-6 (27%)Bowl eligible 69% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBBrayden Roggow, Cibastian Broughton
+22.0 EPA
RBJordan Gant, Sean Patrick
+12.0 EPA
WRMarcel Williams, Brandon Hills +6
+7.1 EPA
TEConnor Cravaack, Elijah Alexander
+5.2 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +17.70.242/play73 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.1943rd#79
Def0.2321st#109
Explosiveness
Off1.1020th#110
Def1.587th#129
Field position
Off71.565th#49
Def71.263rd#52
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off5.1780th#28
Def4.1321st#109
Turnovers
Won 2Lost 2
Margin 0

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.2639th#84
Off · rush
0.1959th#57

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.1959th#57
Def-0.1373rd#38
Passing
Off0.2638th#86
Def0.645th#131

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.67#28
2nd-level / open-field
1.76 / 1.37
Power / stuff (off)
60.0% / 16.3%
Havoc — total (def)
16.8%#63
Havoc — front 7 / DB
10.1% / 6.7%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.03
Def-0.03
Pass downs
Off0.58
Def0.63

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.04#1030.39#450.38#97
Defense-0.22#370.37#1110.78#117

Elo Trajectory

@Wake ForestFinal
Elo rating 925905-20 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.0216th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.487th
  • Offense success rate50%66th
  • Defense success rate allowed43%30th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs54%62nd
  • Offense success — passing downs38%64th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs48%34th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs35%30th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness0.721st
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.512th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.684th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs0.945th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.148th
  • Defense line yards allowed3.317th
  • Offense highlight yards0.8246th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed2.19th
  • Offense power success0.6029th
  • Defense power success allowed0.8042nd
  • Offense stuff rate0.1840th
  • Defense stuff rate0.1634th

Third down

  • Third down conversion46%53rd
  • Third down distance faced4.892nd
  • Third down conversion allowed50%21st
  • Third down distance forced6.939th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.0138th
  • Net success rate — second half0.1870th

Drives

  • Points per drive1.742nd
  • Points per drive allowed3.722nd
  • Average starting field position2314th
  • Opponent starting field position3037th
  • Available yards gained46%42nd
  • Available yards allowed76%10th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive70%31st
  • Scoring opportunities allowed100%16th
  • Points per scoring opportunity2.446th
  • Points allowed per opportunity3.730th
  • Three-and-out rate30%45th
  • Three-and-outs forced0%9th

Roster

  • Returning usage94%97th
  • Returning EPA15964th
  • Team talent composite54712th
  • Recruiting class rank1334th
  • Recruiting class points1474th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.190#79 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.258#86
Rush EPA/play
+0.193#57
Explosiveness
1.098#110
Pts/opportunity
5.17#28
Success rate
48.1%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.064 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disruptive defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.228#109 · below avg
Havoc rate (total)
16.8%#63
Front-7 havoc
10.1%
DB havoc
6.7%
Big play rate allowed
1.581#129
Success rate allowed
37.4%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

Points per game
30.5
Points allowed/game
24.0
Scoring margin/game
+6.5
Turnover margin
+0won 2 · lost 2
Production returning
92%
Talent rank (247)
#121

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE43thEXPLOSIVENESS20thFINISHING80thFIELD POS65thDEFENSE21thHAVOC55th50th100th
Offense
43th
Explosiveness
20th
Finishing
80th
Field Pos
65th
Defense
21th
Havoc
55th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-16.5
#133
Offense
-5.0
#107
Defense
+11.5
#134
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 10 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive1.703.70
Starting field positionown 23.0own 30.0
Available yards45.5%75.9%
Scoring opportunities70.0%100.0%
Points per opportunity2.433.70
Three-and-out rate30.0%0.0%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
55.9%
Expected, given the spots
54.1%
Over expected
+1.7
Fourth down vs peers
-16
Fourth down vs the model
+0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Akron is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Akron in 2026

by EPA/play distance
East CarolinaSP+ -8.1
Off EPA/play +0.174Def EPA/play +0.257Elo 1477
Match
98%
New Mexico StateSP+ -15.0
Off EPA/play +0.216Def EPA/play +0.178Elo 1259
Match
97%
Michigan StateSP+ +1.0
Off EPA/play +0.141Def EPA/play +0.192Elo 1468
Match
97%
RutgersSP+ -3.6
Off EPA/play +0.124Def EPA/play +0.234Elo 1372
Match
97%
KentuckySP+ +8.5
Off EPA/play +0.155Def EPA/play +0.178Elo 1476
Match
97%
ArizonaSP+ +12.6
Off EPA/play +0.185Def EPA/play +0.169Elo 1625
Match
97%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -2.1, #74 of 1282016: -13.1, #102 of 1282017: -16.8, #111 of 1302018: -15.3, #108 of 1302019: -39.0, #129 of 1302020: -27.8, #123 of 1242021: -33.1, #128 of 1302022: -14.3, #111 of 1312023: -19.9, #124 of 1332024: -17.3, #118 of 1342025: -21.3, #128 of 1362026: -16.5, #133 of 138
20152026
Now -16.5 · #133 of 138Best -2.1 in 2015Worst -39.0 in 2019

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20260-10-0
0%
0.0-0.0
20255-74-4
42%
5.0-0.0
20244-83-5
33%
3.5+0.5
20232-101-7
17%
3.8-1.8
20222-101-7
17%
2.0+0.0
20212-101-7
17%
2.7-0.7
20201-51-5
17%
1.8-0.8
20190-120-8
0%
1.4-1.4
20184-82-6
33%
2.9+1.1
20177-76-3
50%
5.3+1.7

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.0%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 4.0-8.0. Wins the Mid-American in 0.9%.

If they finish with…

0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

down 0.0 points since preseasonlost 16-38 to Wake Forest against an expected margin of 29, so +6.7 against the number.

  • The Mid-American takes 0.05 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.0% of seasons, having won their league in 100% of those.

Akron’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk4vs UNLV0.0
  • wk11vs Western Michigan0.0
  • wk7at Miami (OH)0.0
  • wk10vs Ohio0.0
  • wk13vs Buffalo0.0
  • wk5at Central Michigan0.0

Who to root for

Games Akron is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk2Oregon State over Texas Tech0.0
  • wk12UL Monroe over App State0.0
  • wk3Utah State over Utah0.0
  • wk3Middle Tennessee over Nevada0.0
  • wk2Sam Houston over Tulsa0.0
  • wk10Southern Miss over James Madison0.0
The full playoff picture →

Mid-American

0-0 in league play, projected 2.9-5.110 of 13 by title odds
0.9%
Wins the Mid-American
3.0%
Reaches the title game

The Mid-American sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 46% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk11Western Michigan at Akron4.4
  • wk7Akron at Miami (OH)2.9
  • wk3Akron at Minnesota2.8
  • wk4UNLV at Akron2.3

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Mid-American race →

If not the playoff, then

21%
Bowl eligible
20%
Placed in a bowl
0.0%
In the playoff
80%
Season over in November

Akron is 0-1 and needs 6 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • Arizona Bowl4.8%
  • Famous Idaho Potato Bowl4.7%
  • Salute to Veterans Bowl3.3%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl2.6%
  • Boca Raton Bowl1.5%
  • 68 Ventures Bowl1.2%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 10 have sent Akron a player since 2010 — 18 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Akron's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
St. IgnatiusOH30
Glades CentralFL21
ArmwoodFL20
CarverGA20
GlenvilleOH20
MiddletownOH20
Penn HillsPA20
FairfieldOH10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.