Notre Dame vs. Arkansas: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats


NDTeam statsARK
- Q4 8:54NDAneyas Williams 17 Yd Run (Erik Schmidt Kick)56–13
- Q3 1:01NDJadarian Price 16 Yd Run (Erik Schmidt Kick)49–13
- Q2 0:09NDJadarian Price 35 Yd pass from CJ Carr (Noah Burnette Kick)42–13
- Q2 0:35NDJeremiyah Love 3 Yd Run (Noah Burnette Kick)35–13
- Q2 3:48ARKScott Starzyk 49 Yd Field Goal 28–13
- Q2 6:04NDJeremiyah Love 34 Yd pass from CJ Carr (Noah Burnette Kick)28–10
- Q2 8:26NDWill Pauling 23 Yd pass from CJ Carr (Noah Burnette Kick)21–10
- Q2 11:19ARKJacQawn McRoy 1 Yd Run (Scott Starzyk Kick)14–10
- Q1 4:14NDJeremiyah Love 7 Yd pass from CJ Carr (Noah Burnette Kick)14–3
- Q1 8:16NDJeremiyah Love 1 Yd Run (Noah Burnette Kick)7–3
- Q1 12:55ARKScott Starzyk 39 Yd Field Goal 0–3
How the model called it
- PassCJ Carr 22/30, 354 YDS, 4 TD
- RushJadarian Price 13 CAR, 86 YDS, 1 TD
- RecJordan Faison 7 REC, 89 YDS
- PassTaylen Green 17/32, 207 YDS, 1 INT
- RushTaylen Green 10 CAR, 81 YDS
- RecO'Mega Blake 6 REC, 73 YDS
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsND up 36 entering the 4th quarter. Across 339 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
FAQ
What was the final score of Notre Dame vs. Arkansas?
Notre Dame 56, Arkansas 13.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (ND) was correct.
| ND | ARK | |
|---|---|---|
| 641 | Total yards | 365 |
| 431 | Passing yards | 207 |
| 210 | Rushing yards | 158 |
| 32 | First downs | 15 |
| 6-10 | 3rd down | 7-15 |
| 2-3 | 4th down | 1-3 |
| 24/32 | Comp/Att | 17/32 |
| 13.5 | Yards per pass | 6.5 |
| 5.3 | Yards per rush | 5.3 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 2 |
| 5-42 | Penalties | 6-60 |
| 32:47 | Possession | 27:13 |
Costliest call
Q3 13:30 ND go for it on 4th & 10 at ND 25. The model preferred punt, a gap of 1.00 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finish- Q4 8:54NDAneyas Williams 17 Yd Run (Erik Schmidt Kick)56–13
- Q3 1:01NDJadarian Price 16 Yd Run (Erik Schmidt Kick)49–13
- Q2 0:09NDJadarian Price 35 Yd pass from CJ Carr (Noah Burnette Kick)42–13
- Q2 0:35NDJeremiyah Love 3 Yd Run (Noah Burnette Kick)35–13
- Q2 3:48ARKScott Starzyk 49 Yd Field Goal 28–13
- Q2 6:04NDJeremiyah Love 34 Yd pass from CJ Carr (Noah Burnette Kick)28–10
- Q2 8:26NDWill Pauling 23 Yd pass from CJ Carr (Noah Burnette Kick)21–10
- Q2 11:19ARKJacQawn McRoy 1 Yd Run (Scott Starzyk Kick)14–10
- Q1 4:14NDJeremiyah Love 7 Yd pass from CJ Carr (Noah Burnette Kick)14–3
- Q1 8:16NDJeremiyah Love 1 Yd Run (Noah Burnette Kick)7–3
- Q1 12:55ARKScott Starzyk 39 Yd Field Goal 0–3
Model prediction
how the number is builtOur model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (ARK Elo 1677, ND Elo 2126 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects ARK +15.6 (16% to win) — 10.1 points clear of ND's market line of +5.5. That is a disagreement, not a betting edge — sides we favour have not covered at better than breakeven.
Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).
Model as of Sep 15 · through week 2 · drive simulation
Season form — 2025
nationally rankedThe matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profiles| ND | ARK | |
|---|---|---|
| +38.3 (#2) | CORE overall | +10.7 (#37) |
| +20 / -18 | offense / defense | +20 / +9 |
| 3.84 | points / drive | 2.72 |
| 1.28 | allowed / drive | 3.48 |
| 17% | three-and-outs | 21% |
| +0 | pass over expected | -0 |
Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.
Key matchups
The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.
Create a free account →You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →








