Adam Klapka vs Nic Dowd
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Flames skaters
- Mikael Backlund
- Morgan Frost
- Zayne Parekh
- Simon Nemec
- Joel Farabee
- Ryan Strome
- Matvei Gridin
- Matt Coronato
- Adam Klapka
- Connor Zary
- Jake Middleton
- Samuel Honzek
- Martin Pospisil
- Yegor Sharangovich
- Maxim Tsyplakov
- Zach Whitecloud
- Yan Kuznetsov
- Kevin Bahl
- Brennan Othmann
- Joel Hanley
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Golden Knights skaters
- Tomas Hertl
- Brett Howden
- William Karlsson
- Victor Olofsson
- Mark Stone
- Mitch Marner
- Jack Eichel
- Trevor Connelly
- Braeden Bowman
- Marc Gatcomb
- Shea Theodore
- Ivan Barbashev
- Noah Hanifin
- Nic Dowd
- Rasmus Andersson
- Brayden McNabb
- Jeremy Lauzon
- Parker Wotherspoon
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Nic Dowd is ahead on 8 of 12 measures. The widest gap is shot attempts per game: Adam Klapka sits in the 58th percentile, Nic Dowd the 15th.
| Measure | Klapka | Dowd |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 0 | 2 |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 2 |
| Ice time per game | 10:18 | 11:31 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.1353 pct | 0.0733 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 2.358 pct | 1.015 pct |
| Goals above expected | −0.421 pct | −0.330 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 43.4%30 pct | 46.4%37 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 2.3852 pct | 2.8368 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 3.1017 pct | 3.2714 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.0431 pct | +0.0238 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.1764 pct | −0.0136 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.2110 pct | +0.0349 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →














































