Skip to content

Marc Gatcomb vs MacKenzie Weegar

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

MacKenzie Weegar is ahead on 9 of 12 measures. The widest gap is chance share: MacKenzie Weegar sits in the 84th percentile, Marc Gatcomb the 35th.

MeasureGatcombWeegar
Scoring · NHL
Points21
Goals11
Assists10
Ice time per game9:0520:49
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1559 pct0.0841 pct
Shot attempts per game2.048 pct3.073 pct
Goals above expected+0.474 pct+0.783 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share45.7%35 pct63.6%84 pct
Chances for per 602.8570 pct3.9397 pct
Chances against per 603.3912 pct2.2551 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.1353 pct+0.2565 pct
Creates per 60+0.0645 pct+0.0949 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0759 pct+0.1679 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →