Skip to content

Marc Gatcomb vs Mark Stone

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mark Stone is ahead on 11 of 13 measures. The widest gap is chances against per 60: Mark Stone sits in the 56th percentile, Marc Gatcomb the 12th.

MeasureGatcombStone
Scoring · NHL
Points24
Goals12
Assists12
Ice time per game9:0518:22
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1558 pct0.2984 pct
Shot attempts per game2.047 pct2.354 pct
Goals above expected+0.474 pct−0.142 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share45.7%34 pct51.2%50 pct
Chances for per 602.8569 pct2.2947 pct
Chances against per 603.3912 pct2.1856 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.1353 pct+0.4785 pct
Creates per 60+0.0645 pct+0.2169 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0760 pct+0.2690 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 550 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →