Cole Sillinger vs Michael McCarron
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Blue Jackets skaters
- Cole Sillinger
- Matthew Knies
- Danton Heinen
- Mathieu Olivier
- Kent Johnson
- Adam Fantilli
- Sean Monahan
- Zach Werenski
- Denton Mateychuk
- Charlie Coyle
- Dmitri Voronkov
- Conor Garland
- Ryan Lomberg
- Valeri Nichushkin
- Carson Soucy
- Jake Christiansen
- Erik Gudbranson
- Emil Andrae
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Wild skaters
- Matt Boldy
- Kirill Kaprizov
- Quinn Hughes
- Blake Coleman
- Joel Eriksson Ek
- Maxim Shabanov
- Bobby Brink
- Marcus Foligno
- Danila Yurov
- Michael McCarron
- Nick Foligno
- Yakov Trenin
- Ryan Hartman
- Olli Maatta
- Jared Spurgeon
- Daemon Hunt
- Zach Bogosian
- Jonas Brodin
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Cole Sillinger is ahead on 7 of 13 measures. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Cole Sillinger sits in the 82nd percentile, Michael McCarron the 14th.
| Measure | Sillinger | McCarron |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 1 | 3 |
| Goals | 1 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 3 |
| Ice time per game | 14:21 | 15:13 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.4595 pct | 0.0837 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 4.089 pct | 3.073 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.166 pct | −0.233 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 53.4%56 pct | 43.2%30 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.1882 pct | 1.4614 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.7828 pct | 1.9167 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.1321 pct | +0.1049 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.0139 pct | 0.0038 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | −0.1419 pct | +0.1066 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →














































