Skip to content

Arseny Gritsyuk vs Luca Cagnoni

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Arseny Gritsyuk is ahead on 8 of 13 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Arseny Gritsyuk sits in the 98th percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 4th.

MeasureGritsyukCagnoni
Scoring · NHL
Points02
Goals01
Assists01
Ice time per game15:1820:33
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1764 pct0.1661 pct
Shot attempts per game4.089 pct2.766 pct
Goals above expected−0.515 pct+0.578 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share62.9%82 pct29.1%8 pct
Chances for per 603.3187 pct1.135 pct
Chances against per 601.9566 pct2.7431 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.7798 pct−0.454 pct
Creates per 60+0.5193 pct−0.325 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2690 pct−0.1320 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →