Skip to content

Filip Forsberg vs Anton Frondell

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Filip Forsberg is ahead on 9 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Filip Forsberg sits in the 82nd percentile, Anton Frondell the 1st.

MeasureForsbergFrondell
Scoring · NHL
Points34
Goals01
Assists33
Ice time per game20:4317:39
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2477 pct0.1662 pct
Shot attempts per game2.766 pct2.562 pct
Goals above expected−0.79 pct+0.372 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share55.9%63 pct33.3%12 pct
Chances for per 603.2986 pct1.5918 pct
Chances against per 602.6037 pct3.1816 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.4182 pct−0.691 pct
Creates per 60+0.4992 pct+0.1763 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0827 pct−0.851 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →