Gabriel Landeskog vs Emmitt Finnie
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Avalanche skaters
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Martin Necas
- Jaden Schwartz
- Nicolas Roy
- Artturi Lehkonen
- Cale Makar
- Fedor Svechkov
- Nazem Kadri
- T.J. Hughes
- Sam Malinski
- Gabriel Landeskog
- Brock Nelson
- Brent Burns
- Parker Kelly
- Devon Toews
- Zachary L'Heureux
- Brett Kulak
- Josh Manson
- Noah Juulsen
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Red Wings skaters
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Viktor Arvidsson
- Emmitt Finnie
- Lucas Raymond
- Dylan Larkin
- Alex DeBrincat
- Moritz Seider
- Michael Rasmussen
- Andrew Copp
- Justin Faulk
- Carter Mazur
- Axel Sandin-Pellikka
- Nate Danielson
- Marco Kasper
- J.T. Compher
- Ben Chiarot
- Albert Johansson
- Keegan Kolesar
- Anton Johansson
- Mason Appleton
- Andreas Englund
- William Wallinder
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Tomas Hertl
- Tage Thompson
- Kyle Connor
- Vasily Podkolzin
- William Eklund
- Dylan Guenther
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Nick Schmaltz
- Alex Tuch
- William Nylander
- Will Cuylle
- Steven Stamkos
- Adrian Kempe
- Cole Perfetti
- Kirill Marchenko
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- John Tavares
- J.T. Miller
- Sam Reinhart
- Beckett Sennecke
- Clayton Keller
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Cutter Gauthier
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Gabriel Landeskog is ahead on 6 of 11 measures. The widest gap is chances against per 60: Emmitt Finnie sits in the 79th percentile, Gabriel Landeskog the 33rd.
| Measure | Landeskog | Finnie |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 2 | 1 |
| Goals | 1 | 1 |
| Assists | 1 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 15:54 | 16:32 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.1147 pct | 0.3187 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 1.736 pct | 1.736 pct |
| Goals above expected | +0.784 pct | +0.165 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 53.3%56 pct | 58.0%69 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.0880 pct | 2.3249 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.7033 pct | 1.6879 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | +0.5690 pct | +0.5188 pct |
| Creates per 60 | +0.2876 pct | +0.3786 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.2892 pct | +0.1475 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →














































