Skip to content

Justin Faulk vs Joel Armia

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Justin Faulk is ahead on 7 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Joel Armia sits in the 36th percentile, Justin Faulk the 3rd.

MeasureFaulkArmia
Scoring · NHL
Points21
Goals11
Assists10
Ice time per game19:4712:57
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1353 pct0.1558 pct
Shot attempts per game3.073 pct2.048 pct
Goals above expected+0.682 pct+0.680 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share60.8%76 pct60.3%74 pct
Chances for per 602.7565 pct2.3549 pct
Chances against per 601.7774 pct1.5585 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.463 pct0.0036 pct
Creates per 60−0.491 pct−0.0627 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0349 pct+0.0757 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →