Skip to content

Utah Mammoth at Los Angeles Kings

FinalTV FDSNSC, Utah16·Crypto.com Arena

Recap

written from the game data

The Utah Mammoth beat the Los Angeles Kings 6-2. The Mammoth scored first and never trailed. The Mammoth led 5-1 after two periods. The biggest swing in win probability was Logan Cooley's goal at 16:33 of the first period, which took the Mammoth's chances from 61% to 77%. Expected goals favored the Mammoth, 3.6 to 2.2; shots on goal were UTA 28, LAK 31. With league-average goaltending at both ends, the Mammoth win a replay of these chances 65% of the time. Karel Vejmelka stopped 29 of 31 (.935); Darcy Kuemper stopped 11 of 16 (.688), 2.9 goals below expected. Three stars: 1. Mikhail Sergachev (4 A), 2. Alexander Kerfoot (2 G), 3. Logan Cooley (2 G).

Three stars

  1. ★
    UTA
    M. Sergachev4 A
  2. ★★
    UTA
    A. Kerfoot2 G
  3. ★★★
    UTA
    L. Cooley2 G

Line score

goals · shots on goal beneath
Goals and shots on goal by period
Team1st2nd3rdT
UTAUTA31224112628
LAKLAK1908114231

Scoring

8 goals

1st period

  1. UTA
    tip-inxG 0.07win prob +12 ptsVideo
    1-0
    2:31
  2. UTA
    snapxG 0.20win prob +16 ptsVideo
    2-0
    16:33
  3. LAK
    tip-inxG 0.09win prob +16 ptsVideo
    2-1
    17:51
  4. UTA
    L. Cooley(20)PPG
    wristxG 0.17win prob +13 ptsVideo
    3-1
    19:51

2nd period

  1. UTA
    I. Cole (18)
    wristxG 0.09win prob +11 ptsVideo
    4-1
    12:37
  2. UTA
    wristxG 0.20win prob +2 ptsVideo
    5-1
    16:17

3rd period

  1. LAK
    Unassisted
    wristxG 0.04win prob +2 ptsVideo
    5-2
    4:34
  2. UTA
    wristxG 0.50Video
    6-2
    13:53

Penalties

UTA 4 PIM·LAK 6 PIM

1st

  • 18:50LAKAnze Kopitar · Trippingdrawn by Dylan Guenther2 min

2nd

  • 7:40UTAJack McBain · Hookingdrawn by Quinton Byfield2 min
  • 10:21UTADylan Guenther · Trippingdrawn by Joel Armia2 min
  • 16:04LAKScott Laughton · Slashingdrawn by John Marino2 min

3rd

  • 8:27LAKJoel Edmundson · Broken stick2 min

Win probability

ours · the whole game
Tap or hover the chart for the moment-by-moment number
LAK goalUTA goalFinal: LAK 0%

Biggest swing: Logan Cooley, 1st 16:33 — UTA 61% → 77%

Shot map

unblocked attempts · size = our xG
A. Laferriere · On goal · xG 0.16J. Malott · Missed · xG 0.15A. Laferriere · Missed · xG 0.13Q. Byfield · On goal · xG 0.12J. Wright · On goal · xG 0.12Q. Byfield · Missed · xG 0.10S. Laughton · On goal · xG 0.10A. Panarin · On goal · xG 0.10A. Panarin · On goal · xG 0.09A. Kopitar · Goal · xG 0.09J. Armia · On goal · xG 0.08S. Laughton · On goal · xG 0.08S. Laughton · On goal · xG 0.08D. Doughty · On goal · xG 0.07J. Malott · On goal · xG 0.06A. Kempe · Missed · xG 0.06J. Malott · Missed · xG 0.05A. Panarin · On goal · xG 0.05B. Clarke · On goal · xG 0.05Q. Byfield · On goal · xG 0.04J. Edmundson · On goal · xG 0.04A. Kempe · Goal · xG 0.04A. Laferriere · On goal · xG 0.03J. Edmundson · On goal · xG 0.03A. Kempe · Missed · xG 0.03Q. Byfield · On goal · xG 0.03A. Kempe · Missed · xG 0.03S. Helenius · On goal · xG 0.02D. Doughty · On goal · xG 0.02A. Laferriere · Missed · xG 0.02M. Joseph · Missed · xG 0.02D. Doughty · On goal · xG 0.02B. Clarke · Missed · xG 0.02Q. Byfield · Missed · xG 0.02B. Clarke · Missed · xG 0.01J. Edmundson · On goal · xG 0.01D. Doughty · Missed · xG 0.01J. Malott · Missed · xG 0.01T. Moore · On goal · xG 0.01J. Armia · On goal · xG 0.01A. Laferriere · Missed · xG 0.01J. Armia · On goal · xG 0.01S. Laughton · Missed · xG 0.01S. Laughton · On goal · xG 0.01J. Armia · On goal · xG 0.00J. Malott · On goal · xG 0.00B. Clarke · On goal · xG 0.00
LAK2 G · 2.2 xG · 47 att
Tap a shot for who, when and how likely
GoalOn goalMissedBigger = higher xG

Expected goals

UTAvsLAK
3.65 G
All situations
2 G2.2
2.23 G
Even strength
2 G2.0
0.92 G
Power play
0 G0.2

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, from our shot model, summed. 87 unblocked attempts. Empty-net goals are left out of the goal counts.

Deserve to win

on the chances created
UTA65%35%LAK

Flurry-adjusted xG 3.09 – 2.22

How often each side wins a replay of these chances with league-average goaltending at both ends. Rebounds in a flurry are counted once, so a scramble is not three chances.

Team stats

UTAvsLAK
28
Shots on goal
31
47%
Faceoffs
53%
2/3
Power play
0/2
4
Penalty minutes
6
21
Hits
36
13
Blocked shots
24
13
Giveaways
17
6
Takeaways
2

Box score

every player line
Utah Mammoth skaters
SkaterGAP+/-SOGixGHitBlkPIMFO%TOI
98M. SergachevD044+110.09030—25:13
52M. WeegarD000+130.14110—21:08
88N. SchmidtD000+220.01110—20:44
6J. MarinoD011+200.00010—18:17
11D. GuentherR011+220.60102—18:03
28I. ColeD011-120.13120—17:51
8N. SchmaltzC101010.200105017:45
9C. KellerR022020.21000—16:52
92L. CooleyC202+130.681102716:38
67L. CrouseL000+130.26700—16:12
82K. StenlundC000-100.000104714:47
50S. DurziD000-120.02100—14:09
22J. McBainC101+120.823024014:04
15A. KerfootC202020.210106713:55
56K. YamamotoR000+100.0010010013:29
53M. CarconeL000+120.15100—13:01
77J. PeterkaR011+110.09000—12:57
13B. TanevL000-100.00310—10:55
Utah Mammoth goalies
GoalieSASVGASV%xGAGSAxTOI
70K. Vejmelka(W)31292.9352.22+0.2260:00

Season series

UTA leads 2-1

Data: NHL. Model: Gridpex (expected goals and win probability built on NHL play-by-play).