Temple vs. Georgia Tech: Final Score & Recap
Final score, recap & advanced stats
TEMTeam statsGT
- Q4 0:03TEMXavier Irvin 4 Yd pass from Gevani McCoy (Carl Hardin Kick)24–45
- Q4 5:15GTDaylon Gordon 47 Yd Run (Aidan Birr Kick)17–45
- Q4 5:25TEMCarl Hardin 41 Yd Field Goal 17–38
- Q4 8:50GTAidan Birr 32 Yd Field Goal 14–38
- Q3 2:56GTMalachi Hosley 2 Yd Run (Aidan Birr Kick)14–35
- Q3 11:47GTMalachi Hosley 34 Yd Run (Aidan Birr Kick)14–28
- Q3 13:53TEMJoJo Bermudez 28 Yd pass from Evan Simon (Carl Hardin Kick)14–21
- Q2 12:29TEMJay Ducker 2 Yd Run (Carl Hardin Kick)7–21
- Q1 2:38GTIsiah Canion 37 Yd pass from Haynes King (Aidan Birr Kick)0–21
- Q1 7:37GTMalik Rutherford 24 Yd pass from Haynes King (Aidan Birr Kick)0–14
- Q1 11:37GTHaynes King 17 Yd Run (Aidan Birr Kick)0–7
How the model called it
- PassEvan Simon 13/32, 127 YDS, 1 TD
- RushJay Ducker 14 CAR, 76 YDS, 1 TD
- RecJoJo Bermudez 4 REC, 58 YDS, 1 TD
- PassHaynes King 13/18, 161 YDS, 2 TD
- RushJamal Haynes 12 CAR, 107 YDS
- RecIsiah Canion 2 REC, 44 YDS, 1 TD
This exact spot, historically
empirical, no ratingsGT up 21 entering the 4th quarter. Across 671 historically comparable game states (within ±2 pts and ±3 min, from 3,056 games):
- Q3 13:53TEM +8%
Evan Simon pass complete to JoJo Bermudez for 28 yds for a TD
- Q3 11:47GT +6%
Malachi Hosley run for 34 yds for a TD (Aidan Birr KICK)
FAQ
What was the final score of Temple vs. Georgia Tech?
Temple 24, Georgia Tech 45.
Did Gridpex's model pick hit?
Yes — the model's pick (GT) was correct.
| TEM | GT | |
|---|---|---|
| 328 | Total yards | 468 |
| 144 | Passing yards | 161 |
| 184 | Rushing yards | 307 |
| 19 | First downs | 19 |
| 6-19 | 3rd down | 3-8 |
| 3-4 | 4th down | 0-0 |
| 17/37 | Comp/Att | 13/18 |
| 3.9 | Yards per pass | 8.9 |
| 4.2 | Yards per rush | 10.2 |
| 0 | Turnovers | 1 |
| 8-75 | Penalties | 6-55 |
| 37:29 | Possession | 22:31 |
Costliest call
Q2 0:00 TEM field goal on 4th & 10 at GT 43. The model preferred go for it, a gap of 0.37 points.
Drive chart
every possession, start to finish- Q4 0:03TEMXavier Irvin 4 Yd pass from Gevani McCoy (Carl Hardin Kick)24–45
- Q4 5:15GTDaylon Gordon 47 Yd Run (Aidan Birr Kick)17–45
- Q4 5:25TEMCarl Hardin 41 Yd Field Goal 17–38
- Q4 8:50GTAidan Birr 32 Yd Field Goal 14–38
- Q3 2:56GTMalachi Hosley 2 Yd Run (Aidan Birr Kick)14–35
- Q3 11:47GTMalachi Hosley 34 Yd Run (Aidan Birr Kick)14–28
- Q3 13:53TEMJoJo Bermudez 28 Yd pass from Evan Simon (Carl Hardin Kick)14–21
- Q2 12:29TEMJay Ducker 2 Yd Run (Carl Hardin Kick)7–21
- Q1 2:38GTIsiah Canion 37 Yd pass from Haynes King (Aidan Birr Kick)0–21
- Q1 7:37GTMalik Rutherford 24 Yd pass from Haynes King (Aidan Birr Kick)0–14
- Q1 11:37GTHaynes King 17 Yd Run (Aidan Birr Kick)0–7
Model prediction
how the number is builtOur model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (GT Elo 1560, TEM Elo 1221 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects GT -16 (85% to win) — 8.5 points clear of TEM's market line of -24.5. That is a disagreement, not a betting edge — sides we favour have not covered at better than breakeven.
Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).
Model as of Sep 15 · through week 2 · drive simulation
Season form — 2025
nationally rankedThe matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profiles| TEM | GT | |
|---|---|---|
| -11.9 (#100) | CORE overall | +10.6 (#38) |
| -3 / +9 | offense / defense | +13 / +3 |
| 2.16 | points / drive | 2.86 |
| 3.17 | allowed / drive | 2.39 |
| 29% | three-and-outs | 22% |
| +1 | pass over expected | -1 |
Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.
Key matchups
The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.
Create a free account →You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →