Skip to content
Deion Colzie

#4Deion Colzie

Deion Colzie is a Slot Specialist WR for Miami (OH). Deion's 2025 season produced 10.8 total EPA across 30 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Deion Colzie's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
11 Receptions178 Rec yards1 Rec TD16.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume13
  • Explosiveness61
  • Consistency78
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.95 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Akron (SP+ -14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3200.412.5
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
Cade HarrisAir Force0.3300.514.8
Nick NashSan José State0.3100.514.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9500.95Wk 1 vs Wisconsin: +0.50 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Rutgers: -0.21 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs UNLV: +0.55 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Northern Illinois: +0.65 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Akron: +0.95 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Western Michigan: +0.48 EPA/play9Wk 14 vs Ball State: +0.14 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Western Michigan: +0.49 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@WisconsinL0-17-4.411111.00110.50
2@RutgersL17-451.0199.009-0.21
4vsUNLVL38-414.314444.00440.55
6@Northern IllinoisW25-14-16.7188.0180.65
7@AkronW20-7-13.924723.50330.95
9vsWestern MichiganW26-17-1.411414.00140.48
14vsBall StateW45-24-23.022010.00150.14
15vsWestern MichiganL13-23-1.411414.00140.49
20vsFresno StateL3-181.811111.0011

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.5%
Passing plays
10.0%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
3.1%
Passing downs
7.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.