Skip to content
Braedon Sloan

#14Braedon Sloan

Braedon Sloan is a Explosive Back for Ball State. Braedon's 2024 season ranks in the 20th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 174 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Braedon Sloan's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
597 Rush yards4 Rush TD150 Carries4.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
29 Receptions329 Rec yards1 Rec TD11.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency20
  • Volume64
  • Explosiveness20
  • Consistency66
  • Receiving63
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)20th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency66th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.25 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.57 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Miami (OH) (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5700.57Wk 2 vs Missouri State: +0.22 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Miami: +0.26 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Central Michigan: +0.36 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs James Madison: +0.44 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Western Michigan: +0.52 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kent State: +0.32 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Vanderbilt: +0.39 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Northern Illinois: -0.04 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Miami (OH): +0.57 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Buffalo: -0.28 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Bowling Green: -0.14 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Ohio: +0.11 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsMissouri StateW42-34211034.9164610.22
3@MiamiL0-6221.65132.6044100.26
4@Central MichiganL34-37-15.819944.9131800.36
5@James MadisonL7-637.514725.101600.44
6vsWestern MichiganL42-45-10.218653.6039000.52
7@Kent StateW37-35-33.022763.5222100.32
8@VanderbiltL14-244.97284.0044800.39
9vsNorthern IllinoisW25-23-3.517513.004470-0.04
11vsMiami (OH)L21-271.33165.301800.57
12@BuffaloL48-51-4.07213.00-0.28
13vsBowling GreenL13-38-1.87273.90140-0.14
14@OhioL21-422.310313.100.11

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.5%
Passing plays
7.8%
Rushing plays
43.3%
Standard downs
26.6%
Passing downs
14.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.26
Pass / Rush EPA
0.78 / 0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.