Skip to content
Ayden Williams

#11Ayden Williams

Ayden Williams is a Slot Specialist WR for Mississippi State. Ayden's 2025 season produced 6.3 total EPA across 36 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ayden Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
21 Receptions252 Rec yards0 Rec TD12.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency67
  • Volume12
  • Explosiveness33
  • Consistency9
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)67th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency9th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.99 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.48 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Arizona State (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Amare JonesTulane0.1800.012.8
Brandon ChatmanNavy0.2300.612.0
Tyler BuchnerNotre Dame0.2500.312.8
Justin LynchTemple0.2400.315.1
Amare JonesTulane0.2300.813.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.4802.48Wk 1 vs Southern Miss: +0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arizona State: +2.48 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Alcorn State: +0.57 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Northern Illinois: -0.26 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tennessee: +1.78 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas A&M: +0.29 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Florida: -0.42 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas: +1.13 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arkansas: -0.95 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia: -0.12 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Missouri: -0.35 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Ole Miss: -0.48 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@Southern MissW34-17-7.12178.50100.18
2vsArizona StateW24-203.911212.00122.48
3vsAlcorn StateW63-011313.00130.57
4vsNorthern IllinoisW38-10-16.7133.003-0.26
5vsTennesseeL34-4115.014949.00491.78
6@Texas A&ML9-3120.73258.30150.29
8@FloridaL21-233.5133.003-0.42
9vsTexasL38-4516.246917.30331.13
10@ArkansasW38-355.11-1-1.000-0.95
11vsGeorgiaL21-4124.1177.007-0.12
12@MissouriL27-4914.411212.0012-0.35
14vsOle MissL19-3824.02136.507-0.48
20vsWake ForestL29-435.723015.0021

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.1%
Passing plays
9.1%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
2.9%
Passing downs
6.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.40
Passing downs
-0.00
Pass / Rush EPA
0.17 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.