Skip to content
Tony Johnson

#17Tony Johnson

WR·Miami·2025

Tony Johnson is a Vertical Threat WR for Miami.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tony Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
7 Receptions162 Rec yards0 Rec TD23.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume9
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency80
  • Pass-Down90
Player type
Vertical Threat WR

Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.

Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 2.08 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs South Florida (SP+ 12).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3200.412.5
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
Cade HarrisAir Force0.3300.514.8
Nick NashSan José State0.3100.514.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.0802.08Wk 2 vs Bethune-Cookman: +1.10 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Florida: +2.08 EPA/play3Wk 9 vs Stanford: +1.15 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs SMU: +0.04 EPA/play10
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2vsBethune-CookmanW45-312020.00201.10
3vsSouth FloridaW49-1211.626432.00512.08
9vsStanfordW42-7-11.836923.00321.15
10@SMUL20-2613.4199.0090.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.1%
Passing plays
6.7%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
3.1%
Passing downs
3.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.54
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.