Skip to content
Seth Henigan

#9Seth Henigan

QB·Memphis·20242023202220219.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Seth Henigan is a 4-year Dual-Threat QB for Memphis. Seth's 2023 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 552 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Seth Henigan's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2021

3-Star · Developmental
Stars
247 composite
0.8500
National rank
#1,188
High school
Denton Ryan
Hometown
Denton, TX

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2023 Production

Passing
318/476 Comp/Att3883 Pass yards32 Pass TD9 INT66.8% Comp %
Rushing
274 Rush yards5 Rush TD94 Carries2.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat91
  • Consistency92
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency92th %ile · elite
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.56 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs North Texas (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5600.56Wk 1 vs Bethune-Cookman: +0.50 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas State: +0.50 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Navy: +0.32 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Missouri: +0.40 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Boise State: +0.52 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Tulane: +0.28 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UAB: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs North Texas: +0.56 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Florida: +0.54 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Charlotte: +0.27 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs SMU: +0.43 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Temple: +0.40 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsBethune-CookmanW56-1427/363342220.0100.50
2@Arkansas StateW37-3-6.321/292392083.62610.50
3vsNavyW28-24-13.723/352181140.42020.32
4vsMissouriL27-3419.331/473163261.82100.40
5vsBoise StateW35-325.918/282692072.76400.52
7vsTulaneL21-312.824/433213254.6-300.28
8@UABW45-21-14.719/281592050.33600.22
9@North TexasW45-42-6.722/283301068.71400.56
10vsSouth FloridaW59-50-6.623/403494075.94210.54
11@CharlotteW44-38-21.432/483292170.5800.27
12vsSMUL34-3810.135/514022080.61300.43
13@TempleW45-21-21.019/292534169.2500.40
20@Iowa StateW36-267.524/343644095.4271

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
62.3%
Passing plays
99.0%
Rushing plays
19.1%
Standard downs
54.3%
Passing downs
83.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.67
Pass / Rush EPA
0.42 / 0.35

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.260−0.23202220232024
EPA per play · 2021 — 2024 · 50 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Memphis
7.6
229.5
2022Memphis
3.4
200.8
2023Memphis
9.9
288.8
2024Memphis
4.8
203.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.