Skip to content
Seth Henigan

#9Seth Henigan

QB·Memphis·20242023202220217.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Seth Henigan is a 4-year Dual-Threat QB for Memphis. Seth's 2021 season ranks in the 35th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 468 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Seth Henigan's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2021

3-Star · Developmental
Stars
247 composite
0.8500
National rank
#1,188
High school
Denton Ryan
Hometown
Denton, TX

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2021 Production

Passing
235/393 Comp/Att3322 Pass yards25 Pass TD8 INT59.8% Comp %
Rushing
147 Rush yards0 Rush TD80 Carries1.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency35
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat57
  • Consistency79
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)35th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.13 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Navy (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1301.13Wk 1 vs Nicholls: +0.43 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas State: +0.68 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Mississippi State: +0.10 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UTSA: +0.48 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Temple: +0.36 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulsa: +0.35 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Navy: +1.13 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs SMU: +0.53 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs East Carolina: +0.48 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Houston: -0.11 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Tulane: +0.32 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNichollsW42-1719/322651049.9900.43
2@Arkansas StateW55-50-17.922/334175083.3-2600.68
3vsMississippi StateW31-2910.516/281592139.6300.10
4vsUTSAL28-316.515/253291058.9-100.48
5@TempleL31-34-19.124/403053058.41100.36
6@TulsaL29-355.834/574632277.23700.35
7vsNavyW35-17-8.58/122152188.01401.13
10vsSMUW28-258.934/533922165.0300.53
11vsEast CarolinaL29-300.515/262333166.06100.48
12@HoustonL13-3110.921/452081236.1200-0.11
13vsTulaneW33-28-3.927/423363058.11600.32

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
60.9%
Passing plays
99.0%
Rushing plays
16.1%
Standard downs
52.9%
Passing downs
76.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.70
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.260−0.23202220232024
EPA per play · 2021 — 2024 · 50 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Memphis
7.6
229.5
2022Memphis
3.4
200.8
2023Memphis
9.9
288.8
2024Memphis
4.8
203.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.