Skip to content
Que'Sean Brown

#3Que'Sean Brown

WR·Duke·2025

Que'Sean Brown is a Versatile WR for Duke. Que'Sean's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 87 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Que'Sean Brown's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
63 Receptions842 Rec yards5 Rec TD13.4 Yards/rec
Returns
10 Punt returns116 PR yards1 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume26
  • Explosiveness42
  • Consistency45
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency45th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.56 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.45 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs NC State (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Zach AbeyNavy0.3700.825.9
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.3400.722.4
Chris TyreeNotre Dame0.3100.623.6
Noah ShortArmy0.3000.520.7
Malik DunnerBall State0.2900.422.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.4501.45Wk 1 vs Elon: +0.86 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Illinois: -0.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulane: +0.31 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs NC State: +1.45 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Syracuse: +1.26 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs California: +0.91 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Georgia Tech: -0.19 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Clemson: +0.21 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UConn: +1.20 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Virginia: -0.22 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs North Carolina: -0.63 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wake Forest: +0.53 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Virginia: -0.65 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsElonW45-1769315.50440.86
2vsIllinoisL19-4512.911717.0017-0.15
3@TulaneL27-346.368113.50300.31
4vsNC StateW45-334.834113.70151.45
5@SyracuseW38-3-13.156412.80251.26
6@CaliforniaW45-21-3.2610417.31260.91
8vsGeorgia TechL18-279.333913.0031-0.19
10@ClemsonW46-459.568013.32430.21
11@UConnL34-375.156112.20251.20
12vsVirginiaL17-3411.13144.706-0.22
13@North CarolinaW32-25-6.64164.0014-0.63
14vsWake ForestW49-325.735117.00260.53
15vsVirginiaW27-2011.1231.505-0.65
20vsArizona StateW42-393.91017817.8269

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.2%
Passing plays
16.8%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
8.0%
Passing downs
12.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.58
Pass / Rush EPA
0.38 / -1.42

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.