Skip to content
Michael Carter

#8Michael Carter

RB·North Carolina·20202.8 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Michael Carter is a Explosive Back for North Carolina. Michael's 2020 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 175 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Michael Carter's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Rushing
1245 Rush yards9 Rush TD156 Carries8.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
25 Receptions267 Rec yards2 Rec TD10.7 Yards/rec
Returns
8 Kick returns156 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume68
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency74
  • Receiving65
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.96 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Western Carolina.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9600.96Wk 2 vs Syracuse: +0.54 EPA/play2Wk 5 vs Boston College: +0.56 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Virginia Tech: +0.91 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Florida State: -0.04 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs NC State: +0.44 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Virginia: -0.13 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Duke: +0.44 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Wake Forest: -0.01 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Notre Dame: +0.17 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Western Carolina: +0.96 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Miami: +0.59 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsSyracuseW31-6-9.877811.1066000.54
5@Boston CollegeW26-220.9161217.601600.56
6vsVirginia TechW56-4513.71721412.6211500.91
7@Florida StateL28-31-4.917653.80250-0.04
8vsNC StateW48-210.0171066.2124600.44
9@VirginiaL41-440.99647.102-40-0.13
10@DukeW56-24-4.217855.0134610.44
11vsWake ForestW59-530.816744.604551-0.01
13vsNotre DameL17-3121.08577.1012300.17
14vsWestern CarolinaW49-98739.131600.96
15@MiamiW62-2612.82430812.822900.59

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.8%
Passing plays
8.5%
Rushing plays
36.2%
Standard downs
27.3%
Passing downs
13.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.38
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.56 / 0.37

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.070−0.24
EPA per play · 2020 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.