Skip to content
Luke McCaffrey

#10Luke McCaffrey

WR·Nebraska·20200.7 pts line value1st Round

Luke McCaffrey is a Possession Receiver WR for Nebraska. Luke's 2020 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 122 plays — a developing rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Luke McCaffrey's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Passing
46/74 Comp/Att438 Pass yards1 Pass TD6 INT62.2% Comp %
Rushing
357 Rush yards3 Rush TD62 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
1 Receptions5 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume84
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down80
Player type
Possession Receiver WR

Chain-mover who earns targets through reliability. High volume, short-to-intermediate routes, consistent floor every week.

High target shareChain moverReliable floor
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used WRs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.3101.039.7
Jerrod HeardTexas0.2901.633.6
Shane TuckerMiddle Tennessee0.3201.631.0
Jafar ArmstrongNotre Dame0.3201.025.3
Chris TyreeNotre Dame0.3100.623.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3400.34Wk 8 vs Ohio State: -0.05 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Northwestern: -0.15 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Penn State: +0.34 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Illinois: +0.20 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Iowa: +0.24 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Purdue: +0.04 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Minnesota: -0.31 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
8@Ohio StateL17-5228.4155.005-0.05
10@NorthwesternL13-219.0-0.15
11vsPenn StateW30-2313.90.34
12vsIllinoisL23-41-5.40.20
13@IowaL20-2616.30.24
14@PurdueW37-275.90.04
15vsMinnesotaL17-244.7-0.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.3%
Passing plays
37.3%
Rushing plays
22.8%
Standard downs
26.1%
Passing downs
37.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.10 / 0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.410−0.37
EPA per play · 2020 · 7 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.