Skip to content
Keon Coleman

#4Keon Coleman

Keon Coleman is a Red Zone Weapon WR for Florida State. Keon's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 79 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Keon Coleman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
50 Receptions658 Rec yards11 Rec TD13.2 Yards/rec
Returns
25 Punt returns300 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume30
  • Explosiveness41
  • Consistency62
  • Pass-Down40
Player type
Red Zone Weapon WR

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency62th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.36 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.97 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Duke (SP+ 9).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Zach AbeyNavy0.3700.825.9
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
JoJo NatsonUtah State0.3901.019.9
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.3400.722.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9701.97Wk 1 vs LSU: +0.88 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Southern Miss: +0.16 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Boston College: -0.38 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Clemson: +0.66 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Virginia Tech: +0.16 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Syracuse: +0.89 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Duke: +1.97 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Wake Forest: +0.13 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Miami: +0.12 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs North Alabama: +0.61 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida: +1.91 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisville: -0.22 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsLSUW45-2419.1912213.63410.88
2vsSouthern MissW66-13-14.434816.01340.16
3@Boston CollegeW31-29-5.9-0.38
4@ClemsonW31-2410.558617.22380.66
6vsVirginia TechW39-175.83227.30140.16
7vsSyracuseW41-3-4.4914015.61580.89
8vsDukeW38-209.425427.00301.97
9@Wake ForestW41-16-7.97669.42290.13
11vsMiamiW27-209.64246.0180.12
12vsNorth AlabamaW58-1335317.71240.61
13@FloridaW24-156.812424.00241.91
14vsLouisvilleW16-68.04194.809-0.22

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.6%
Passing plays
20.5%
Rushing plays
0.5%
Standard downs
10.4%
Passing downs
10.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.44
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
0.45 / -0.50

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.