Skip to content
Kenny Tracy

#9Kenny Tracy

Kenny Tracy is a Pass-Catching Back for Miami (OH). Kenny's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 60 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kenny Tracy's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
272 Rush yards1 Rush TD49 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions121 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume61
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency5
  • Receiving88
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency5th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.73 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Northern Illinois (SP+ -17).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7300.73Wk 1 vs Wisconsin: -0.25 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Rutgers: -0.40 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs UNLV: +0.38 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Lindenwood: +0.20 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Northern Illinois: +0.73 EPA/play6
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@WisconsinL0-17-4.46152.502110-0.25
2@RutgersL17-451.06132.20150-0.40
4vsUNLVL38-414.3161046.5068420.38
5vsLindenwoodW38-0201346.7122100.20
6@Northern IllinoisW25-14-16.7166.000.73

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
21.4%
Passing plays
10.3%
Rushing plays
30.5%
Standard downs
24.9%
Passing downs
13.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
0.77 / -0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.