Skip to content
Ka'Deem Carey

#25Ka'Deem Carey

RB·Arizona·20133.1 pts line value1st Round

Ka'Deem Carey is a Featured Back for Arizona. Ka'Deem's 2013 season ranks in the 35th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 326 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ka'Deem Carey's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2013 Production

Rushing
1885 Rush yards19 Rush TD349 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
26 Receptions173 Rec yards1 Rec TD6.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2013 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency35
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency59
  • Receiving32
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)35th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency59th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.26 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.44 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UNLV (SP+ -10).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Jeremy McNicholsBoise State0.3304.7112.2
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4400.44Wk 2 vs UNLV: +0.44 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UTSA: +0.33 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Washington: +0.35 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs USC: +0.39 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Utah: -0.01 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Colorado: +0.13 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs California: -0.18 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UCLA: -0.10 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Washington State: -0.02 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oregon: +0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Arizona State: +0.08 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Boston College: +0.18 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2@UNLVW58-13-10.11617110.720.44
3vsUTSAW38-13-6.6271284.7223300.33
5@WashingtonL13-3120.5301324.4144900.35
7@USCL31-3822.5211386.6063600.39
8vsUtahW35-2411.8392325.91310-0.01
9@ColoradoW44-20-0.7231195.2431200.13
10@CaliforniaW33-28-8.7321524.80-0.18
11vsUCLAL26-3120.0281495.31120-0.10
12vsWashington StateL17-248.2261325.116451-0.02
13vsOregonW42-1628.7482064.341-500.10
14@Arizona StateL21-5817.5321574.910.08
1vsBoston CollegeW42-197.1271696.320.18

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
38.1%
Passing plays
6.7%
Rushing plays
58.7%
Standard downs
43.2%
Passing downs
24.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
0.22
Pass / Rush EPA
0.50 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.500−0.24
EPA per play · 2013 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.