Skip to content
Jaziun Patterson
Jaziun Patterson

#4Jaziun Patterson

RB·Iowa·2025

Jaziun Patterson is a Committee Back for Iowa. Jaziun's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 51 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jaziun Patterson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
296 Rush yards0 Rush TD60 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
3 Receptions9 Rec yards0 Rec TD3.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume29
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency64
  • Receiving32
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.47 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Oregon (SP+ 26).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4700.47Wk 1 vs UAlbany: +0.41 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Iowa State: +0.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Massachusetts: +0.28 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Rutgers: +0.35 EPA/play4Wk 9 vs Minnesota: +0.05 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Oregon: +0.47 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs USC: +0.21 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Michigan State: -0.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Nebraska: +0.11 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUAlbanyW34-77476.700.41
2@Iowa StateL13-169.911605.501200.08
3vsMassachusettsW47-7-36.610545.402700.28
4@RutgersW38-281.06376.200.35
9vsMinnesotaW41-31.55183.600.05
11vsOregonL16-1825.92105.000.47
12@USCL21-2616.98374.600.21
13vsMichigan StateW20-17-3.46244.00-0.30
14@NebraskaW40-166.22126.000.11
20vsVanderbiltW34-2720.33-3-1.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.2%
Passing plays
1.8%
Rushing plays
15.5%
Standard downs
12.3%
Passing downs
4.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
-0.09
Pass / Rush EPA
0.14 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.