Skip to content
Ja'Carree Kelly

#9Ja'Carree Kelly

Ja'Carree Kelly is a Slot Specialist WR for Delaware. Ja'Carree's 2025 season produced 12.2 total EPA across 36 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ja'Carree Kelly's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
32 Receptions304 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.5 Yards/rec
Returns
6 Kick returns134 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume13
  • Explosiveness17
  • Consistency43
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency43th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.29 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.78 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Western Kentucky (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3200.412.5
Cade HarrisAir Force0.3300.514.8
Nick NashSan José State0.3100.514.0
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7801.78Wk 1 vs Delaware State: +0.62 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Colorado: +1.76 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UConn: -0.71 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida International: -0.03 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Western Kentucky: +1.78 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Jacksonville State: -0.57 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.16 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Liberty: +0.37 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.08 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Sam Houston: +1.10 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsDelaware StateW35-1722211.01130.62
2@ColoradoL7-31-8.328341.50671.76
3vsUConnW44-415.15193.806-0.71
4@Florida InternationalW38-16-10.5284.004-0.03
6vsWestern KentuckyL24-271.622914.50181.78
8@Jacksonville StateL25-38-6.7122.002-0.57
9vsMiddle TennesseeW31-28-16.05234.6080.16
10@LibertyL30-59-9.04246.0080.37
11vsLouisiana TechW25-24-1.3242.004-0.08
12vsSam HoustonL23-26-27.846516.30301.10
20vsLouisianaW20-13-10.13258.3018

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.7%
Passing plays
7.7%
Rushing plays
0.3%
Standard downs
3.5%
Passing downs
7.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.01
Passing downs
0.67
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / -2.69

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.