Skip to content

Delaware Blue Hens

Conference USA·1-1·
Elo
1404#90
SP+
-7.6#99
FPI
-4.6
AP
NR
Nextvs Coastal Carolina · Wk 3Win prob 92%Model -22.2
Talent #134 (483.5)Recruiting class #11585% production returning

Team Leaders

Roster · 106 players

FR 30SO 24JR 22SR 30
#PlayerPosClHtWt
2Riley TrujilloQBJR6'4"215
4Nick MinicucciQBSR6'2"215
7Tyler BellQBFR6'1"195
11EJ Archield Jr.QBSO6'4"215
16Braden StreeterQBJR6'2"215
19Sean SutherlandQBFR6'2"184
3Kaderris RobertsRBSR5'9"175
21Viron Ellison Jr.RBJR6'0"212
25Jared PorterRBSO5'7"187
26Greg SpillerRBJR5'10"205
27Jo SilverRBSR5'10"200
28Nakeem PowellRBFR6'0"200
30Reginald Lea IIRBFR5'10"220
34Naseem TentionRBFR5'11"185
0Bryson GravesWRJR5'10"177
1Brandon RehmannWRJR6'0"190
5Da'Wain LoftonWRSR5'11"190
6Nick TyreeWRJR5'8"182
10Tae'Sean RobinsonWRFR6'0"188
13Ty SalazerWRSO5'11"171
14Donovan LewisWRSR5'9"190
17Emmanuel DokuWRSO6'5"210
18Sean WilsonWRJR6'0"190
43Luke BrownWRJR5'10"180
80Matthew McKinley-DanielsWRJR6'0"185
81Jake BlumWRFR6'1"193
83Calvin ThomasWRSO6'2"190
84Ashton NavarreteWRSR5'9"180
87Carson GriffinWRFR6'2"185
89Brandon DeAngeloWRFR5'10"170
12Josh HumesTESR6'1"230
15Rowen WalshTEFR6'5"240
40Scott MooreTESO6'5"250
41David OravetzTEFR6'4"245
85Jackson WhitacreTEJR6'4"245
86Jaxson BowmanTESO6'5"255
88Elijah SessomsTESR6'4"250
51Chandler TelfaireOLSO6'4"305
52Miles MuldrowOLFR6'5"275
55Dylan StewartOLSO6'4"314
59Patrick MethlieOLSR6'3"305
60Carter SareykaOLJR6'5"315
61Steven DemboskiOLSR6'4"305
62Anthony CacceseOLSR6'6"305
63Collier BookOLFR6'5"275
65Wahkeem RomanOLSR6'6"315
67Mustafa KannehOLSR6'4"320
71Brandon TruszkowskiOLFR6'7"300
74Tyler BurnhamOLJR6'6"320
75Noah RosahacOLJR6'5"300
77Jack SmallOLJR6'8"310
78Bentley Allen IIOLSO6'5"325
79Jaiden EdwardsOLFR6'5"275
0Q'yaeir PriceDESR6'2"245
3Brandon GorhamDESO6'3"245
13Noah MatthewsDESR6'5"255
14James SteelDESO6'4"285
44Kaeden SingletonDEJR6'3"250
49Yamdry HernandezDESO6'3"242
88Sam SiafaDESR6'4"300
89Nate RayDESR6'2"255
28Quincy SmithDTJR6'1"280
33Trace Scott IIIDTJR6'4"275
52Dominick BrognaDTSR6'2"300
53Carson ShockleyDTJR6'2"245
90Noah FrazierDTFR6'2"270
91Christian CorbinDTFR6'2"292
96Dylan MannDTSR6'1"310
4Demarco DanielsLBFR6'1"215
9Colin GallagherLBJR6'1"220
10Blake MatthewsLBSR6'2"215
11Jawarren CorbinLBSR6'1"235
15Gevaris LassiterLBSO6'2"215
20Jalen BellLBJR6'2"192
32Joseph ZamotLBFR6'0"215
35Gavin MoulLBSR6'0"227
37Dillon GriffithLBSO6'0"195
42Wayne Cunningham Jr.LBFR6'2"220
46Julius PuryearLBSO6'2"220
54Tysean Milligan Jr.LBSR5'11"235
57Gehret GentzyelLBFR6'2"215
6Kshawn Cox Jr.CBSR5'10"180
8Jaquise AlexanderCBSR5'11"175
18Jamarion KolagbodiCBSO6'0"180
21Trent GummerCBFR5'10"175
23Shawn Church Jr.CBFR6'3"195
24Jalen RossCBSO6'0"180
25Azir LeeCBSO6'0"180
30Jaylen MackCBJR5'9"170
34Walter AndersonCBFR5'10"159
38Derrick Phillips Jr.CBSR6'0"170
2Kahlil AliSSR6'1"200
5Dannell Jester Jr.SFR6'0"185
7KT SeaySSR6'2"190
16Noah JeffersonSSO6'2"194
19Kevin MooreSFR6'1"195
22Dorian RutledgeSFR6'2"185
27AJ GrahamSSO6'1"205
29George MullinsSSO6'3"190
36Nasir EatmonSSO6'0"190
31Tucker SmackPKSR5'11"174
92Kason MullisPKFR6'4"193
39Josh CupittPSR5'11"185
99Austin LaBellmanPFR6'3"205
45Luke EpsteinLSFR5'10"183
49Maddox SillsLSSO6'5"230

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
34.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
21.0
scoring defense
Differential
+13.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
442.5#44
Yards / play
6.3#58
Passing yards / game
337.5#12
Rushing yards / game
105.0#119
First downs / game
22.5#50
3rd down %
32.1%#110
4th down %
100.0%#1
Time of possession
29:19#88
Defense
Yards allowed / game
291.5#49
Yards / play allowed
4.2#34
Pass yards allowed / game
217.5#86
Rush yards allowed / game
74.0#20
3rd down % allowed
29.0%#38
Sacks
6#20
Tackles for loss
10#79
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
0#69
Takeaways
3#46
Giveaways
3#74
Penalties / game
3.0#3
Penalty yards / game
24.0#5

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

Delaware is in year 2 under Ryan Carty. The strengths are offensive, led by 24th on first and second down. The way in is 137th at keeping everything in front of them, and they are 109th at keeping opponents off schedule through the air.

Delaware has played 2 games against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Offensefirst and second down
    #24
    projected
  • Offensestaying on schedule through the air
    #27
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #137
    projected
  • Defensestaying on schedule through the air
    #109
    projected
  • Defenserunning it
    #108
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
7.74.3
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
6.7
of 10 games
Bowl odds
95%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
92%
vs Coastal Carolina
Toughest
8%
vs Virginia

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 30% chance
Likeliest finish 8-4 (30%)Bowl eligible 95% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
WRDa'Wain Lofton, Donovan Lewis +3
+25.2 EPA
RBKaderris Roberts, Jo'Nathan Silver +2
+20.2 EPA
QBNick Minicucci, Braden Streeter
+19.5 EPA
TEElijah Sessoms, Scott Moore
+0.6 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +20.40.299/play68 snaps
EPA -1.1-0.047/play23 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.1943rd#79
Def-0.0990th#15
Explosiveness
Off1.4888th#17
Def1.2745th#76
Field position
Off70.360th#56
Def69.478th#31
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.0047th#74
Def2.3380th#28
Turnovers
Won 3Lost 3
Margin 0

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.3959th#57
Off · rush
0.0734th#92

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.0732nd#94
Def-0.0972nd#40
Passing
Off0.3958th#58
Def0.1756th#61

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.03#135
2nd-level / open-field
1.22 / 0.86
Power / stuff (off)
55.6% / 28.6%
Havoc — total (def)
18.8%#43
Havoc — front 7 / DB
9.0% / 9.7%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.12
Def-0.08
Pass downs
Off0.30
Def-0.11

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.03#990.38#430.49#76
Defense-0.25#21-0.05#340.34#70

Elo Trajectory

MerrimackFinal
Elo rating 14041411+7 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 46 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.1633rd
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.0883rd
  • Offense success rate40%28th
  • Defense success rate allowed31%81st

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs48%42nd
  • Offense success — passing downs27%24th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs39%68th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs18%90th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.486th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.329th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.152nd
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.692nd

Trenches

  • Offense line yards2.410th
  • Defense line yards allowed2.278th
  • Offense highlight yards0.8842nd
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.3977th
  • Offense power success0.6025th
  • Defense power success allowed0.5078th
  • Offense stuff rate0.259th
  • Defense stuff rate0.2042nd

Third down

  • Third down conversion33%21st
  • Third down distance faced9.31st
  • Third down conversion allowed29%76th
  • Third down distance forced8.176th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.1259th
  • Net success rate — second half0.0754th

Drives

  • Points per drive1.020th
  • Points per drive allowed2.541st
  • Average starting field position2518th
  • Opponent starting field position3710th
  • Available yards gained35%23rd
  • Available yards allowed57%33rd
  • Scoring opportunities per drive69%24th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed91%24th
  • Points per scoring opportunity2.235th
  • Points allowed per opportunity2.854th
  • Three-and-out rate15%82nd
  • Three-and-outs forced18%33rd

CORE

  • CORE offense-1.925th
  • CORE defense-2.664th
  • CORE overall0.6651st

Roster

  • Returning usage92%96th
  • Returning EPA30096th
  • Team talent composite4833rd
  • Recruiting class rank11517th
  • Recruiting class points16717th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.191#79 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.386#58
Rush EPA/play
+0.074#94
Explosiveness
1.482#17
Pts/opportunity
4.00#74
Success rate
41.0%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.312 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disruptive defense — top 11 nationally in EPA/play allowed
EPA/play allowed
-0.091#15 · top 20%
Havoc rate (total)
18.8%#43
Front-7 havoc
9.0%
DB havoc
9.7%
Big play rate allowed
1.274#76
Success rate allowed
31.3%

Disruption comes primarily from the secondary.

📊

Season Signature

34.0 PPG offense, 21.0 allowed — +13.0 margin/game
Points per game
34.0
Points allowed/game
21.0
Scoring margin/game
+13.0
Turnover margin
+0won 3 · lost 3
Production returning
85%
Talent rank (247)
#134

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE43thEXPLOSIVENESS88thFINISHING47thFIELD POS60thDEFENSE90thHAVOC69th50th100th
Offense
43th
Explosiveness
88th
Finishing
47th
Field Pos
60th
Defense
90th
Havoc
69th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-4.3
#88
Offense
-5.6
#105
Defense
-1.4
#65
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 13 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive1.002.54
Starting field positionown 24.6own 36.7
Available yards34.9%57.2%
Scoring opportunities69.2%90.9%
Points per opportunity2.222.80
Three-and-out rate15.4%18.2%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
55.6%
Expected, given the spots
59.5%
Over expected
-4.0
Fourth down vs peers
-5
Fourth down vs the model
+0
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Delaware is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Delaware in 2026

by EPA/play distance
OklahomaSP+ +21.7
Off EPA/play +0.175Def EPA/play -0.099Elo 1799
Match
99%
SyracuseSP+ +2.7
Off EPA/play +0.158Def EPA/play -0.087Elo 1288
Match
98%
North Dakota StateSP+ +2.6
Off EPA/play +0.228Def EPA/play -0.075Elo 1562
Match
98%
BaylorSP+ +4.9
Off EPA/play +0.166Def EPA/play -0.043Elo 1506
Match
97%
IowaSP+ +18.0
Off EPA/play +0.166Def EPA/play -0.040Elo 1847
Match
97%
PittsburghSP+ +10.1
Off EPA/play +0.193Def EPA/play -0.009Elo 1681
Match
95%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-10-0
50%
1.0+0.0
20257-64-4
54%
5.8+1.2
20249-27-2
82%
7.7+1.3
20239-46-2
69%
7.2+1.8
20228-54-4
62%
6.4+1.6
20215-63-5
45%
0.0+5.0
20207-14-0
88%
20195-73-5
42%
0.0+5.0
20187-55-4
58%
20177-45-3
64%
0.0+7.0

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.3%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 7.0-5.4. Wins the Conference USA in 20%.

If they finish with…

31%
1 loss
1.9%
2 losses
0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

Win out and it is 31%. One bid goes to the best champion outside the four power leagues, so running the table only enters them into that argument.

up 0.0 points since preseason.

  • At 1 loss they are 31% where the average Conference USA team is 24%.
  • The Conference USA takes 0.03 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.3% of seasons, having won their league in 99% of those.

Delaware’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk4at Virginia4.0
  • wk5vs Liberty0.7
  • wk9at Western Kentucky0.6
  • wk11vs Florida International0.5
  • wk12at New Mexico State0.5
  • wk3vs Coastal Carolina0.5

Who to root for

Games Delaware is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk5Marshall over James Madison0.2
  • wk9UAB over South Florida0.2
  • wk8Washington State over Boise State0.2
  • wk6Fresno State over Boise State0.2
  • wk10Tennessee over Kentucky0.2
  • wk3Utah over Utah State0.2
The full playoff picture →

Conference USA

0-0 in league play, projected 5.1-2.92 of 10 by title odds
20%
Wins the Conference USA
38%
Reaches the title game

The Conference USA sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 42% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk5Liberty at Delaware27.3
  • wk11Florida International at Delaware21.9
  • wk9Delaware at Western Kentucky19.9
  • wk13Jacksonville State at Delaware19.6

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Conference USA race →

If not the playoff, then

74%
Bowl eligible
74%
Placed in a bowl
0.3%
In the playoff
26%
Season over in November

Delaware is 1-1 and needs 5 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • Armed Forces Bowl21%
  • Hawai'i Bowl16%
  • New Orleans Bowl11%
  • 68 Ventures Bowl6.5%
  • Boca Raton Bowl5.7%
  • Cure Bowl4.7%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 5 have sent Delaware a player since 2010 — 12 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Delaware's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
MiddletownOH40
Bergen CatholicNJ30
DeMatha CatholicMD30
EastsideGA10
MillbrookNC10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.