Skip to content
Nick Minicucci

#4Nick Minicucci

QB·Delaware·20252.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Nick Minicucci is a Dual-Threat QB for Delaware. Nick's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 577 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nick Minicucci's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
322/514 Comp/Att3671 Pass yards23 Pass TD7 INT62.6% Comp %
Rushing
235 Rush yards10 Rush TD112 Carries2.1 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

34
Attempts
11.3y
Avg depth
4.9y
After catch
56%
Catch rate

The ball travels 11.3 yards in the air on an average throw 3.5 yards deeper than the median. Another 4.9 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
4
75% · 108y
1
0% · 0y
2
50% · 37y
short
11
64% · 69y
4
25% · 5y
12
58% · 87y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat85
  • Consistency82
  • Clutch37
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.53 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Delaware State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5300.53Wk 1 vs Delaware State: +0.53 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Colorado: +0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UConn: +0.36 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida International: +0.25 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Western Kentucky: +0.35 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Jacksonville State: +0.15 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.48 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Liberty: +0.41 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.07 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Sam Houston: +0.23 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wake Forest: -0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UTEP: +0.46 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsDelaware StateW35-1728/362513073.84410.53
2@ColoradoL7-31-8.318/363121149.3500.32
3vsUConnW44-415.123/342651067.72030.36
4@Florida InternationalW38-16-10.523/352183164.6400.25
6vsWestern KentuckyL24-271.628/473140158.35530.35
8@Jacksonville StateL25-38-6.732/504221050.91300.15
9vsMiddle TennesseeW31-28-16.027/422764063.0-200.48
10@LibertyL30-59-9.029/493442162.83710.41
11vsLouisiana TechW25-24-1.326/523042243.15500.07
12vsSam HoustonL23-26-27.824/363381121.1-3410.23
13@Wake ForestL14-525.721/301401047.3-130-0.10
14vsUTEPW61-31-17.524/373113084.74710.46
20vsLouisianaW20-13-10.119/301761040.740

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
64.6%
Passing plays
95.2%
Rushing plays
22.6%
Standard downs
57.8%
Passing downs
78.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.28
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.33

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.590−0.16
EPA per play · 2025 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.