Skip to content

Delaware Blue Hens

Conference USA·1-1·
Elo
1404#90
SP+
-7.6#99
FPI
-4.6
AP
NR
Nextvs Coastal Carolina · Wk 3Win prob 92%Model -22.2
Talent #134 (483.5)Recruiting class #11585% production returning

Team Leaders

Roster · 106 players

FR 30SO 24JR 22SR 30
#PlayerPosClHtWt
2Riley TrujilloQBJR6'4"215
4Nick MinicucciQBSR6'2"215
7Tyler BellQBFR6'1"195
11EJ Archield Jr.QBSO6'4"215
16Braden StreeterQBJR6'2"215
19Sean SutherlandQBFR6'2"184
3Kaderris RobertsRBSR5'9"175
21Viron Ellison Jr.RBJR6'0"212
25Jared PorterRBSO5'7"187
26Greg SpillerRBJR5'10"205
27Jo SilverRBSR5'10"200
28Nakeem PowellRBFR6'0"200
30Reginald Lea IIRBFR5'10"220
34Naseem TentionRBFR5'11"185
0Bryson GravesWRJR5'10"177
1Brandon RehmannWRJR6'0"190
5Da'Wain LoftonWRSR5'11"190
6Nick TyreeWRJR5'8"182
10Tae'Sean RobinsonWRFR6'0"188
13Ty SalazerWRSO5'11"171
14Donovan LewisWRSR5'9"190
17Emmanuel DokuWRSO6'5"210
18Sean WilsonWRJR6'0"190
43Luke BrownWRJR5'10"180
80Matthew McKinley-DanielsWRJR6'0"185
81Jake BlumWRFR6'1"193
83Calvin ThomasWRSO6'2"190
84Ashton NavarreteWRSR5'9"180
87Carson GriffinWRFR6'2"185
89Brandon DeAngeloWRFR5'10"170
12Josh HumesTESR6'1"230
15Rowen WalshTEFR6'5"240
40Scott MooreTESO6'5"250
41David OravetzTEFR6'4"245
85Jackson WhitacreTEJR6'4"245
86Jaxson BowmanTESO6'5"255
88Elijah SessomsTESR6'4"250
51Chandler TelfaireOLSO6'4"305
52Miles MuldrowOLFR6'5"275
55Dylan StewartOLSO6'4"314
59Patrick MethlieOLSR6'3"305
60Carter SareykaOLJR6'5"315
61Steven DemboskiOLSR6'4"305
62Anthony CacceseOLSR6'6"305
63Collier BookOLFR6'5"275
65Wahkeem RomanOLSR6'6"315
67Mustafa KannehOLSR6'4"320
71Brandon TruszkowskiOLFR6'7"300
74Tyler BurnhamOLJR6'6"320
75Noah RosahacOLJR6'5"300
77Jack SmallOLJR6'8"310
78Bentley Allen IIOLSO6'5"325
79Jaiden EdwardsOLFR6'5"275
0Q'yaeir PriceDESR6'2"245
3Brandon GorhamDESO6'3"245
13Noah MatthewsDESR6'5"255
14James SteelDESO6'4"285
44Kaeden SingletonDEJR6'3"250
49Yamdry HernandezDESO6'3"242
88Sam SiafaDESR6'4"300
89Nate RayDESR6'2"255
28Quincy SmithDTJR6'1"280
33Trace Scott IIIDTJR6'4"275
52Dominick BrognaDTSR6'2"300
53Carson ShockleyDTJR6'2"245
90Noah FrazierDTFR6'2"270
91Christian CorbinDTFR6'2"292
96Dylan MannDTSR6'1"310
4Demarco DanielsLBFR6'1"215
9Colin GallagherLBJR6'1"220
10Blake MatthewsLBSR6'2"215
11Jawarren CorbinLBSR6'1"235
15Gevaris LassiterLBSO6'2"215
20Jalen BellLBJR6'2"192
32Joseph ZamotLBFR6'0"215
35Gavin MoulLBSR6'0"227
37Dillon GriffithLBSO6'0"195
42Wayne Cunningham Jr.LBFR6'2"220
46Julius PuryearLBSO6'2"220
54Tysean Milligan Jr.LBSR5'11"235
57Gehret GentzyelLBFR6'2"215
6Kshawn Cox Jr.CBSR5'10"180
8Jaquise AlexanderCBSR5'11"175
18Jamarion KolagbodiCBSO6'0"180
21Trent GummerCBFR5'10"175
23Shawn Church Jr.CBFR6'3"195
24Jalen RossCBSO6'0"180
25Azir LeeCBSO6'0"180
30Jaylen MackCBJR5'9"170
34Walter AndersonCBFR5'10"159
38Derrick Phillips Jr.CBSR6'0"170
2Kahlil AliSSR6'1"200
5Dannell Jester Jr.SFR6'0"185
7KT SeaySSR6'2"190
16Noah JeffersonSSO6'2"194
19Kevin MooreSFR6'1"195
22Dorian RutledgeSFR6'2"185
27AJ GrahamSSO6'1"205
29George MullinsSSO6'3"190
36Nasir EatmonSSO6'0"190
31Tucker SmackPKSR5'11"174
92Kason MullisPKFR6'4"193
39Josh CupittPSR5'11"185
99Austin LaBellmanPFR6'3"205
45Luke EpsteinLSFR5'10"183
49Maddox SillsLSSO6'5"230

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
34.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
21.0
scoring defense
Differential
+13.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
442.5#49
Yards / play
6.3#62
Passing yards / game
337.5#15
Rushing yards / game
105.0#113
First downs / game
22.5#51
3rd down %
32.1%#108
4th down %
100.0%#1
Time of possession
29:19#83
Defense
Yards allowed / game
291.5#60
Yards / play allowed
4.2#42
Pass yards allowed / game
217.5#86
Rush yards allowed / game
74.0#29
3rd down % allowed
29.0%#46
Sacks
6#12
Tackles for loss
10#51
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
0#66
Takeaways
3#30
Giveaways
3#95
Penalties / game
3.0#6
Penalty yards / game
24.0#6

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

Delaware is in year 2 under Ryan Carty. The strengths are offensive, led by 34th on first and second down. The way in is 136th at keeping everything in front of them, and they are 108th at defending the run.

Delaware has not played an FBS opponent yet, so this is the projection: last season regressed toward the mean, plus returning production, recruiting, talent and whether the staff is the same one.

Projected strengths

  • Offensefirst and second down
    #34
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #136
    projected
  • Defenserunning it
    #108
    projected
  • Defensestaying on schedule through the air
    #106
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
7.74.3
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
6.7
of 10 games
Bowl odds
95%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
92%
vs Coastal Carolina
Toughest
8%
vs Virginia

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 30% chance
Likeliest finish 8-4 (30%)Bowl eligible 95% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
WRDa'Wain Lofton, Donovan Lewis +3
+25.2 EPA
RBKaderris Roberts, Jo'Nathan Silver +2
+20.2 EPA
QBNick Minicucci, Braden Streeter
+19.5 EPA
TEElijah Sessoms, Scott Moore
+0.6 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +20.40.299/play68 snaps
EPA -1.1-0.047/play23 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.2552nd#67
Def-0.0374th#37
Explosiveness
Off1.4887th#19
Def1.2753rd#66
Field position
Off70.355th#63
Def69.480th#29
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.0048th#72
Def1.7585th#22
Turnovers
Won 2Lost 1
Margin +1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.3955th#62
Off · rush
0.0739th#85

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.0738th#86
Def-0.0966th#47
Passing
Off0.3955th#62
Def0.1752nd#67

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.01#127
2nd-level / open-field
1.22 / 0.86
Power / stuff (off)
55.6% / 30.6%
Havoc — total (def)
18.9%#51
Havoc — front 7 / DB
9.1% / 9.8%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.12
Def-0.08
Pass downs
Off0.47
Def0.05

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.03#990.38#460.49#83
Defense-0.25#30-0.05#380.34#69

Elo Trajectory

MerrimackFinal
Elo rating 14041404+0 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 31 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.4073rd
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.1280th
  • Offense success rate47%57th
  • Defense success rate allowed25%88th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs54%63rd
  • Offense success — passing downs33%52nd
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs30%85th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs19%76th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.582nd
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.420th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.172nd
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.588th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards2.939th
  • Defense line yards allowed2.076th
  • Offense highlight yards0.6134th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.3665th
  • Offense power success0.6029th
  • Defense power success allowed0.0099th
  • Offense stuff rate0.2516th
  • Defense stuff rate0.1842nd

Third down

  • Third down conversion50%66th
  • Third down distance faced7.622nd
  • Third down conversion allowed25%77th
  • Third down distance forced8.169th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.2978th
  • Net success rate — second half0.1565th

Roster

  • Returning usage92%96th
  • Returning EPA30096th
  • Team talent composite4833rd
  • Recruiting class rank11517th
  • Recruiting class points16717th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

EPA/play
+0.250#67 · average
Pass EPA/play
+0.386#62
Rush EPA/play
+0.074#86
Explosiveness
1.482#19
Pts/opportunity
4.00#72
Success rate
41.4%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.312 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disruptive defense suppressing opponents below the national average
EPA/play allowed
-0.032#37 · above avg
Havoc rate (total)
18.9%#51
Front-7 havoc
9.1%
DB havoc
9.8%
Big play rate allowed
1.274#66
Success rate allowed
31.5%

Disruption comes primarily from the secondary.

📊

Season Signature

34.0 PPG offense, 21.0 allowed — +13.0 margin/game
Points per game
34.0
Points allowed/game
21.0
Scoring margin/game
+13.0
Turnover margin
+1won 2 · lost 1
Production returning
85%
Talent rank (247)
#134

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE52thEXPLOSIVENESS87thFINISHING48thFIELD POS55thDEFENSE74thHAVOC64th50th100th
Offense
52th
Explosiveness
87th
Finishing
48th
Field Pos
55th
Defense
74th
Havoc
64th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-7.0
#98
Offense
-1.5
#74
Defense
+5.4
#118
Full CORE ratings →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Delaware is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Delaware in 2026

by EPA/play distance
Colorado StateSP+ -7.5
Off EPA/play +0.301Def EPA/play -0.025Elo 1336
Match
98%
Iowa StateSP+ +3.1
Off EPA/play +0.303Def EPA/play -0.038Elo 1586
Match
98%
PittsburghSP+ +10.1
Off EPA/play +0.193Def EPA/play -0.009Elo 1681
Match
97%
TroySP+ -11.4
Off EPA/play +0.233Def EPA/play +0.027Elo 1420
Match
97%
SyracuseSP+ +2.7
Off EPA/play +0.213Def EPA/play -0.087Elo 1288
Match
97%
TulsaSP+ -2.3
Off EPA/play +0.186Def EPA/play -0.071Elo 1268
Match
96%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.0+0.0
20257-64-4
54%
5.8+1.2
20249-27-2
82%
7.7+1.3
20239-46-2
69%
7.2+1.8
20228-54-4
62%
6.4+1.6
20215-63-5
45%
0.0+5.0
20207-14-0
88%
20195-73-5
42%
0.0+5.0
20187-55-4
58%
20177-45-3
64%
0.0+7.0

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.4%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-0 so far, projected to finish 6.3-5.9. Wins the Conference USA in 13%.

If they finish with…

25%
1 loss
1.2%
2 losses
0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

up 0.1 points since preseason.

  • At 1 loss they are 25% where the average Conference USA team is 13%.
  • The Conference USA takes 0.02 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.4% of seasons, having won their league in 100% of those.

Delaware’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk4at Virginia4.1
  • wk2at Vanderbilt3.2
  • wk5vs Liberty1.0
  • wk10at Kennesaw State0.9
  • wk9at Western Kentucky0.8
  • wk12at New Mexico State0.8

Who to root for

Games Delaware is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk13Georgia over Georgia Tech0.3
  • wk9Notre Dame over Navy0.3
  • wk3Massachusetts over Stonehill0.2
  • wk11Oregon State over Boise State0.2
  • wk7Kent State over South Florida0.2
  • wk2Nebraska over Bowling Green0.2
The full playoff picture →

Conference USA

0-0 in league play, projected 4.5-3.53 of 10 by title odds
13%
Wins the Conference USA
25%
Reaches the title game

The Conference USA sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 42% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk5Liberty at Delaware22.2
  • wk10Delaware at Kennesaw State18.2
  • wk4Delaware at Virginia17.6
  • wk9Delaware at Western Kentucky17.2

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Conference USA race →

If not the playoff, then

62%
Bowl eligible
61%
Placed in a bowl
0.4%
In the playoff
38%
Season over in November

Delaware is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent.

  • Hawai'i Bowl14%
  • Armed Forces Bowl13%
  • New Orleans Bowl11%
  • 68 Ventures Bowl7.5%
  • Boca Raton Bowl5.2%
  • Cure Bowl3.7%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 5 have sent Delaware a player since 2010 — 12 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Delaware's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
MiddletownOH40
Bergen CatholicNJ30
DeMatha CatholicMD30
EastsideGA10
MillbrookNC10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.