Skip to content
Deuce Adams

#8Deuce Adams

Deuce Adams is a Volume Passer for Louisville.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Deuce Adams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
15/21 Comp/Att112 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT71.4% Comp %
Rushing
33 Rush yards0 Rush TD14 Carries2.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume25
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency29
  • Clutch31
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency29th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 1.32 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.00 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Eastern Kentucky.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.5403.54Wk 1 vs Eastern Kentucky: +1.00 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs Bowling Green: -1.29 EPA/play4Wk 8 vs Miami: +0.40 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Virginia Tech: -3.54 EPA/play10Wk 13 vs SMU: -0.03 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Kentucky: -0.28 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsEastern KentuckyW51-172/3210061.71001.00
4vsBowling GreenW40-17-12.61/1-3000.0-60-1.29
8@MiamiW24-2120.7700.40
10@Virginia TechW28-16-10.100-3.54
13@SMUL6-3813.412/17940066.6140-0.03
14vsKentuckyW41-01.880-0.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.8%
Passing plays
12.3%
Rushing plays
6.1%
Standard downs
7.7%
Passing downs
12.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.05
Passing downs
-0.10
Pass / Rush EPA
0.03 / -0.23

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.